Is the existence of George Washington a hypothesis? Can you replicate him?
Without missing links, it's dubious.
Thousands (maybe tens of thousands) of missing links exist. Of course every time one is found, two more gaps appear in the fossil record...
With Piltdown Man, it was fraud.
So you're disproving all independent dating methods, because... one guy perpetrated one hoax 80 years ago? I'm confused.
The fossil record has yet to be proven.
What does that mean, that fossils don't exist?
While some scientific techniques are used among the many types of specimen analysis and data extrapolation techniques used by researchers--(many of them honest and nonfraudulent)--stating hypothesis-testing-allegedly-in-progress as scientific facts that happen to verify one's personal theology or atheism is nonetheless serving as priest-advocate, not scientist.
Sir, I don't understand that sentence. Please do us the favor of writing it in English.
Summary:
There is a lot of fraud masquerading as scientific research.
There is a lot of atheist religion masquerading as scientific research.
I don’t like paying taxes to teach students faux science/religion of atheism.
If it’s hypothesis, I want it clearly identified as such.
Sir, I don't understand that sentence. Please do us the favor of writing it in English.
These things are bound to happen. I mean, think about it, some assumptions must be made. You wouldn't ask a fish what time it is and expect to understand the fish's response.