Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/29/2007 3:32:13 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Renfield
These muted witnesses to an age practically before Mankind.

[SNIP]

He says these stumps are almost 4,000 years old.

Don't see too many journalists with a YEC viewpoint. Interesting.

2 posted on 05/29/2007 3:36:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield
He says these stumps are almost 4,000 years old.

he says a hell of a lot more than that:

doomed creatures; last, desperate escape; a dreadful fate beneath the rest of the world; reduced to twisted, tortured shapes that scream silently

...my goodness.
3 posted on 05/29/2007 4:03:47 AM PDT by 4buttons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield

Sounds like one of the Cascadia events.


4 posted on 05/29/2007 4:08:00 AM PDT by djf (Skulz wurk gud! My last Wopper was purfict!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; SunkenCiv

Ping!.....sorta............


6 posted on 05/29/2007 5:32:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield

The article can’t be correct. Now that global warming has raised sea levels, exposure wouldn’t be possible.


7 posted on 05/29/2007 6:54:09 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield

I will be up that away this September and try to see for myself.


9 posted on 05/29/2007 7:06:47 AM PDT by razorback-bert (Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; ...
Thanks Red Badger
Roger Hart... says these stumps are almost 4,000 years old... "Curt Peterson and I published a radiocarbon on a sample taken from the Arch Cape stumps in 1998," Hart said. "The age is 3,660 with an error of 70. This means these trees died at that time, were buried in sand, and have been preserved under a cover of sand until now. From the photos it appears that the stumps are more extensively exposed now than in 1998."
So now they're 3,669 years old. [rimshot!] The RC age is *not* a reference to when the trees died, but rather to the age of the ring (or rings) which were tested. The catastrophe which buried all this stuff is less than that -- perchance 3,450 years? ;')
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
 

10 posted on 05/29/2007 10:33:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 26, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
Thanks Red Badger.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

11 posted on 05/29/2007 10:36:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 26, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield
twisted, tortured shapes that scream silently from another epoch?

It was a dark and stormy night . . .

13 posted on 05/29/2007 10:39:22 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield

remnnants of Noah’s flood.


16 posted on 05/29/2007 10:41:35 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield

21 posted on 05/29/2007 11:21:05 AM PDT by uglybiker (relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield
I have a 380 million year old forest sticking out of the rocks about an hour south of me in NY...

see: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press/00-49pr.html

24 posted on 05/29/2007 2:44:41 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

28 posted on 05/29/2007 5:16:55 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield
He says these stumps are almost 4,000 years old.

Finally, half-way through the article, some meat. Thought he'd never get around to telling us.

What killed them, anyhoo? The author never did get around to that.

37 posted on 05/30/2007 9:12:06 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Renfield
They are unintentional memorials to the grandiose forest that once stood here, now reduced to twisted, tortured shapes that scream silently from another epoch.

I don't think that anything but people or things made by them can be described as "grandiose."
42 posted on 05/30/2007 8:39:49 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson