Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's ethanol follies
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | July 17, 2007 | Editorial

Posted on 07/17/2007 8:14:58 AM PDT by Graybeard58

Sometimes, when a patient has an imaginary illness, the doctor will prescribe harmless pills called placebos. Somehow, they work: The patient thinks the illness is being treated, and the symptoms diminish or go away.

In 2005, California took a $17 million placebo for global warming. Specifically, the state bought a fleet of 1,138 Chevrolet Impalas and Silverado trucks designed to run on E-85, a blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline.

Trouble is, California has no filling stations that sell E-85. No such stations were scheduled to open until 2009. In the interim, according to the San Jose Mercury News, the "flex-fuel" vehicles traveled a collective 10 million miles and burned more than 413,202 gallons of ordinary gasoline.

It gets even sillier. The Impalas replaced smaller, more fuel-efficient Ford Focuses so that, in the words of the Mercury News, "the flex-fuel vehicles are actually chugging out more smog and greenhouse gases than many vehicles in the state's old fleet — as much as 2,000 tons annually."

On orders from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the state's General Services Department has called for bids to open an ethanol station a few blocks from the state capitol. However, the corn needed for California refineries to make ethanol has to be hauled in from the Midwest, most of it on diesel-powered trains or trucks, further negating any clean-air benefit.

Said Severin Borenstein, director of the University of California Energy Institute: "This is about California politicians wanting to be leaders in alternative energy. They just jump on whatever is sexy."

Thus, there is a bright side to California's E-85 vehicle mess. Even if the state overpaid for the vehicles by 10 percent, and even if the vehicles were 10 percent less fuel efficient, the total cost to the state probably wasn't much more than $5 million. As bogus remedies for imaginary maladies go, California is getting off cheaply.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; energy; ethanol; govwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2007 8:15:00 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Just follow the money....


2 posted on 07/17/2007 8:16:07 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank; kiriath_jearim; Little Bill; mojo114; padre35; Harrius Magnus; spikeytx86; ...

Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.

If you want on or off this ping list, let me know.


3 posted on 07/17/2007 8:16:39 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

HA!
HA HA!
HA HA HA!

Leave it to moonbats to not think things through. Unintended consequences indeed!


4 posted on 07/17/2007 8:19:37 AM PDT by Sir Hailstone (Graduate of The Archie Bunker School of Conservatism [http://digitalfarmers.blogspot.com])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Hailstone

But they FEEL so much better for having done it!


5 posted on 07/17/2007 8:22:00 AM PDT by txroadhawg ("To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Same tired old rhetoric: "Since there is no infrastructure to support E85, why use it?"

There never WILL be any infrastructure for E85 -- or any other alternative fuel -- until someone takes the first step. Any step that reduces our dependence on Mideast oil is a step in the right direction. I don't care if we have to power our cars with burning currency.

6 posted on 07/17/2007 8:23:27 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

great article... :)


7 posted on 07/17/2007 8:23:28 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txroadhawg

What kind of society burns their food?


8 posted on 07/17/2007 8:27:55 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: txroadhawg

In that case go to a GM dealer and buy some of those “Flexfuel” emblems and glue them to your car.

As with these Impalas it won’t do any good but it’ll make people feel better.


9 posted on 07/17/2007 8:27:57 AM PDT by Sir Hailstone (Graduate of The Archie Bunker School of Conservatism [http://digitalfarmers.blogspot.com])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Its not about substance, its about the image. The image secured votes. Nuff said.
10 posted on 07/17/2007 8:28:30 AM PDT by raftguide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Hello CA, I’ll sell WVA to you. Just send me a check to $500,000.00.


11 posted on 07/17/2007 8:31:38 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Thus, there is a bright side to California's E-85 vehicle mess. Even if the state overpaid for the vehicles by 10 percent, and even if the vehicles were 10 percent less fuel efficient, the total cost to the state probably wasn't much more than $5 million

I know it must be tongue in cheek, but...if the placebo was 17 million, how does it only cost the state 5 million?
that must be 5 million on top of the 17 million ?

If gas is 3 bucks a gallon, it's 1m+ dollars to date just in paying for more gas.
12 posted on 07/17/2007 8:32:26 AM PDT by stylin19a (Don't buy a putter until you have had a chance to throw it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
What kind of society burns their food?

1) The corn being used for ethanol is not sweet corn. It is a feed grain, i.e., corn used for animal feed.

2) Once the sugars and starches are extracted from the corn to make ethanol, the proteins are still intact and the residue a highly sought animal feed. In other words, the corn retains its usefulness as a feed grain.

13 posted on 07/17/2007 8:37:22 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

The MPG decrease makes ethanol more expensive that gasoline.


14 posted on 07/17/2007 8:42:55 AM PDT by JRochelle (Vacant Lott needs to be evicted from the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
The MPG decrease makes ethanol more expensive that gasoline.

BINGO! That's my main bone to pick... if it was cheaper, I'd buy it, but I lose over 30% MPG efficiency when burning E85 in my Tahoe... in some mid-western states they skip the state taxes on E85 which makes it cheaper than Regular Unleaded, but here in Texas, E85 is more expensive than regular when you take into account you have to buy 30% more of it than you do regular to go the same distance.

E85 is a joke.
15 posted on 07/17/2007 8:55:16 AM PDT by TexasGunLover ("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
“What kind of society burns their food?”

The same society that kills their unborn children.
By the way people normally eat sweet corn not feed corn. And DDG(Dried Distillers Grain) provides an excellent high protein livestock feed supplement.

16 posted on 07/17/2007 8:56:42 AM PDT by ME-262 (Nancy Pelosi is known to the state of CA to render Viagra ineffective causing reproductive harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I heard that the cows don’t eat the de-ethanized feed.


17 posted on 07/17/2007 9:02:50 AM PDT by Otaku6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover
This is all inconsequential when compared to the fact that ethanol raises the price of whiskey.
18 posted on 07/17/2007 9:06:52 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"Any step that reduces our dependence on Mideast oil is a step in the right direction. I don't care if we have to power our cars with burning currency."

From what I have heard from people who know better than I, ethanol is a net energy sink. It takes more energy to get a gallon of corn ethanol than you get from burning it. In the mean time, you might as well be burning money.

There are a number of things that the United States can do to improve our "energy independence". More refineries, more offshore drilling. etc. However, oil is (and will continue to be) a global commodity. IIRC, we get a lot of our our from Mexico and Venzuela; Alaska's oil goes to Japan; Europe gets it from the ME. Even if the U.S. still had "neutral" oil imports, price would be affected by global events.

19 posted on 07/17/2007 9:10:48 AM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Hilarious!

Liberal politics is all about symbolism and good intentions. Don't let facts or reality ruin the daydream.

20 posted on 07/17/2007 9:13:03 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson