To: LiteKeeper
Whats the attraction of seeing another set of monkey bones? I understand that that's a question intended entirely to inflame, but, first, the attraction is that Lucy has done more than any other single fossil to expand our understanding of our human family tree.
Second, Lucy isn't a monkey, and until such time as you can understand the difference between an Australopithecine and a monkey, I'd suggest you'd refrain from bloviating on science threads.
7 posted on
08/06/2007 7:17:44 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
Nailed it. Square on the head.
Good luck and remember, you can teach but you cannot always educate.
Got to go. I am off the the Creation Museum to watch another episode of the Flintstones.
To: Alter Kaker
I understand that that's a question intended entirely to inflame
No, no, no...This is meant to inflame...
You're quite right, Lucy the Australopithecine
wasn't a monkey...err...quite. ;9
12 posted on
08/06/2007 7:34:11 PM PDT by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson