Loved your post! Couldn’t have said it better myself. I too, have given up on debating with libs. The INTENTIONAL lack of logic and comprehension they bring to the table is infuriating! Intentional, yes I did say intentional - I’m convinced they do it on purpose, because they know (subconsciously if not consciously) that they will lose any logical argument.
Thanks. I believe they think the end justifies the means so that whatever means they must use to achieve their view of a socialist liberal utopia whether it be based in what they know to be “reality” or not. I don’t think they really care. I mean what kind person asks the question “who are the terrorists” when talking about our soldiers if they don’t believe there is some degree of equivalence? Then they have the gall to whine when someone calls them to the mat for the only logical interpretation of their banal comment. The left should be debated as if they are not there.
The way I debate with challenged individuals is to stick to the core point and keep reemphasizing it. Liberals count on their ability to trick others into following them onto irrational emotional ground. So one never asks the question whether the claims of the liberal are correct or based on fact but instead end up caught up in a stupid argument about women and coat hangers and gay men getting beat up and brown skin men the who are victims of the guns they wield in the commission of crime.
Just the other day I was talking with some people at lunch and the topic of legalizing drugs came up and the assertion was made that when drugs are legalized that crime and usage decreases. I pointed out accurately that was just not true and that it was a myth. The sad thing is that most liberal myths are not even debatable. They have no foundation in reality and exist solely in the minds of those who make them up.
It reminds me of a discussion I had with a young emptyheaded girl when I was in high school. We were having a discussion and she arrived at the conclusion that history was not real!
How in the hell do you debate people who accept nothing as reality that does not confirm what they already think to be true? I want to scream when I encounter radical indistinctiveness where the most ignorant assertions are given the same status as well reasoned ideas supported by known verifiable facts.