Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2007 7:18:54 PM PDT by Reform Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fanfan; GMMAC; xcamel; DaveLoneRanger; Baynative; calcowgirl; sourcery; Clive; sionnsar; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/17/2007 7:19:44 PM PDT by Reform Canada (Kyoto=>More Unemployment=>More Poverty=>More Homeless=>More Crime=>More Rape & Murder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

bump


3 posted on 08/17/2007 7:21:42 PM PDT by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

***”On global cooling,” he writes, “there was never anything even remotely approaching the current scientific consensus that the world is growing warmer because of the emission of greenhouse gases.” ***

If it’s concensus, it ain’t scientific. Science deals with FACT, not concensus.


4 posted on 08/17/2007 7:23:10 PM PDT by irishtenor (There is no "I" in team, but there are two in IDIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

The truth is that global warming would be far more benevolent to mankind than global cooling.


6 posted on 08/17/2007 7:23:44 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada
Meacham dismisses it. "On global cooling," he writes,

What a poor answer. If he wanted to make a better case he could have started the discussion off with something like the first weather satellites were just getting going in 1974 (approx) or something like that. That would have made for a much better argument.
7 posted on 08/17/2007 7:24:20 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada
To steal from Dennis Miller.......

we are talking about 1.8 degrees over 100 years...

does anyone else find that to be remarkably stable?

I sure as hell do.

8 posted on 08/17/2007 7:24:45 PM PDT by Nitro (Nitro does it with a BANG!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

It’s about a Fabian Socialist agenda. Evidence and facts mean nothing. Mis-leading the Sheeple means everything.


9 posted on 08/17/2007 7:26:07 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

10 posted on 08/17/2007 7:30:19 PM PDT by HighWheeler (The higher the concentration of libs, the bigger the tragedy that follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada
"The greatest dangers to liberty," Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, "lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."

Global warming enthusiasts are "nen of zeal", to be sure. And clearly "without understanding".

But "well-meaning"? I'm not so sure...

There are the power-trippers, the crooks and the dupes. Which, do you suppose, is Algore...???

11 posted on 08/17/2007 7:30:22 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

Even the worst characterizations of McCarthy by the Left are minimal compared to the fundamentalist, jihad like religious fervor of the warm-mongers. In rhetoric at least, and thankfully not action, they are rapidly approaching demanding adherence to dogma unseen since the Spanish Inquisition.


13 posted on 08/17/2007 7:31:42 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada; All

NOT ONE MENTION of the NASA temperature manipulation and coverup scandal.


15 posted on 08/17/2007 7:35:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

I am so tired of this fake “issue”.


17 posted on 08/17/2007 7:48:48 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada
...simply brushes aside the 1975 report as "alarmist" and "discredited."

As opposed to today's hysteria??? Anyone here an echo of "WOLF!" ???

28 posted on 08/17/2007 8:53:58 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

33 posted on 08/17/2007 9:24:23 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada
Yet Meacham, quoting none of this, simply brushes aside the 1975 report as "alarmist" and "discredited." Today, he assures his readers, Newsweek's climate-change anxieties rest "on the safest of scientific ground." Do they?

No, because Meacham is just a lying S.O.S..
34 posted on 08/17/2007 9:36:11 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada; 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
"On global cooling," he writes, "there was never anything even remotely approaching the current scientific consensus that the world is growing warmer because of the emission of greenhouse gases." ...in 1975... the magazine reported that scientists were "almost unanimous" in believing that the looming Big Chill would mean a decline in food production, with some warning that "the resulting famines could be catastrophic." Moreover, it said, "the evidence in support of these predictions" -- everything from shrinking growing seasons to increased North American snow cover -- had "begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it." Yet Meacham, quoting none of this, simply brushes aside the 1975 report as "alarmist" and "discredited."
Meachum is discredited, Newsweek is (twice) discredited, and -- you guessed it -- The Debate Is Over. ;') Thanks RC.
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

35 posted on 08/17/2007 9:47:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, August 17, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

How can there be a consensus when they cannot get the correct temperature data on which to base it. NASA and NOAA can’t agree as to which was the warmest year in the contiguous 48 states.


38 posted on 08/17/2007 10:12:40 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

I remember being told in college in the mid 70s that we were going to run out of food and fuel by 1990 and we would have to evacuate the northern half of North America because glaciers would cover it. This is the same class in which I pissed off Linus Pauling who said we were all going to die from nuclear war because Edward Teller was promoting a first strike on the soviets.


43 posted on 08/17/2007 11:40:48 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reform Canada

BUMP

Hypocrisy and liberal spin do not get any worse than Newsweak.


45 posted on 08/18/2007 1:40:28 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; BlessedBeGod; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


The morning meelee...
48 posted on 08/18/2007 6:15:23 AM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson