To: fanfan
If male, refused to ask for directions, if female, complaining about dirty cave.
Didn’t the finger painting in the French ice caves dating back some 20 million years not have footprints?
3 posted on
08/20/2007 4:10:21 PM PDT by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: edcoil
Most of the caves with paintings don’t have foot prints.
Just imagine how bizarre we might look to future archaeologists, 500 or 1000 years from now.
:-)
(Oh no! I didn’t turn this into a creation/evolution thread, did I?)
8 posted on
08/20/2007 4:16:05 PM PDT by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: edcoil
Didn’t the finger painting in the French ice caves dating back some 20 million years not have footprints?
Humans haven't been on the planet for 20 million years. Even Australopithicus only goes back about 5 million.
10 posted on
08/20/2007 4:18:10 PM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
To: edcoil; fanfan
The really scary thing not mentioned is they found the 2nd oldest footprint in Israel.
The first was a left foot, the secong a right foot
And they were both REALLY BIG
13 posted on
08/20/2007 4:21:36 PM PDT by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
To: edcoil
painting in the French ice caves They are ordinary rock caves and the paintings might be 30,000 years old give or take.
20 posted on
08/20/2007 4:36:45 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: edcoil
and if it's determined to be the print of someone born feb. 29th ... it's only 5 million years old.
:D
22 posted on
08/20/2007 4:49:02 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: edcoil
If it was a male you KNOW he tracked that mud into the cave.
27 posted on
08/20/2007 5:29:31 PM PDT by
Ditter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson