To: blam
What about the theory of a mini-black hole? That would explain no crater.
To: canuck_conservative
What about the theory of a mini-black hole? That would explain no crater. Watch it you'll get thrown off the radio.
Actual the theory for years has been that the thing exploded about a mile are more above ground, they say that is why the flash was seen in Britain and there was really no crater.
8 posted on
11/14/2007 8:52:40 PM PST by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: canuck_conservative
Personally, I've always thought comet, which would seem consistent with an above ground explosion and the flattening of such a huge swath of forest. The "crater" delineated by the lake might have taken the final central punch of momentum generated by the object, pushing atmosphere - and that much lithosphere - out of the way, as it were, as it's physical attributes had already melted.
Just a hunch, that I've always been drawn to.
9 posted on
11/14/2007 8:58:00 PM PST by
onedoug
To: canuck_conservative
But they do have a crater ... sort of ... the funnel shaped crater.
10 posted on
11/14/2007 8:58:53 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: canuck_conservative
Too clever by half. The current airburst theory (correct or not) is more likely.
55 posted on
11/15/2007 7:47:13 AM PST by
LIConFem
(Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson