If the threat to us is so great, why is our leader leaving the borders open? (Which gives those Islamofascists who want to behead us a way to get in through the backdoor) Logically, either the threat is not so great, or Bush doesn’t seem to care much about national security. Which is it?
The border is a problem and should be dealt with. We have not been attacked again since 9/11 by al Qaeda. That is six years, while we have been hunting them down around the globe and killing them. If al Qaeda could attack us they would. GW must be doing something right. Paul would leave al Qaeda alone to garner new recruits, train, grow in strength and attack our allies around the world. Much like Clinton did.
What does Ron Paul’s surrender monkey antisemitism, which this thread is about, have to do with W’s incomprehensible failure to guard our borders?
Do you think the threat isn’t there? Do you think that the fact that W doesn’t plug the leak makes RP’s lunacy acceptable?
You aren’t being logical but it seems that logic flies out the window when it comes to supporting Perot. Oops, wrong election.
Michael Frazier