Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Good point.

After all, they claim it would “only” supply us oil for “only” five years.

Har. Har.


14 posted on 12/01/2007 8:02:48 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
ANWR at 20 million barrels per day of usage and assuming 10 billion in reserves [if it could be produced that fast which of course it can’t] would supply the U.S. for a year and a half. It would replace the imported portion of the U.S. consumption for nearly two years. Obviously if it turns out to be 20 billion, which is well beyond expectations, double these numbers.

For the world, divide the 10 billion by 86 million to arrive less than four months. "Yes" we need to drill ANWR, but should not be deluded into believing that it is going to save us.

18 posted on 12/01/2007 8:40:33 PM PST by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson