Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I agree that there are a lot of above ground factor that serve to limit production.

What’s your take on the prospects of continuing to produce oil at the rate of 86 million barrels per day [or to actually to boost production significantly?]

The discovery curve [peaked in the late 1960s], the age of the existing giant oil fields [the things I have read about Ghawar, Burgan, Danquing don’t bode well] and the rather ugly decline curves in the North Sea and Cantarell have caused me to conclude that if the peak isn’t here, it will be soon.

I see a lot of promise in ultra heavy oil tar sands in Canada and Hugo Land, but that stuff won’t be anywhere near as much fun for the producers and the flow rates won’t be anything like what we have experienced for conventional crudes.

20 posted on 12/01/2007 8:57:31 PM PST by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: R W Reactionairy
I see a lot of promise in ultra heavy oil tar sands in Canada

Oil sand production in Alberta Canada has been flow for 4 decades.

38 posted on 12/02/2007 11:04:14 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson