To: Red Badger
For more than a year, the sun has been experiencing a lull in activity, marking the end of Solar Cycle 23, which peaked with many furious storms in 2000--2003. "Solar minimum is upon us," he says. Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place?
To: Just mythoughts
What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place? Ask Helen Thomas......
7 posted on
12/18/2007 5:45:15 AM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Just mythoughts
From: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10may_longrange.htm ...A word about solar cycles: Astronomers number each 11-year solar cycle, 1, 2, 3 and so on. For obscure historical reasons, Solar Cycle 1 is a nondescript cycle which peaked in 1760. The most recent cycle, Cycle 23, peaked in 2001 and is coming to an end now....
10 posted on
12/18/2007 5:48:22 AM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Just mythoughts
[Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place?]
I am not sure when they date the model. But considering the average length of a cycle is 11 years, one can guess the beginning observations go back 250 years or more.
But, in 1957-60 the sunspot numbers were the highest ever recorded. As a result, radio communications were very good at higher frequencies (14-70 MHz).
In addition, the midwest was experiencing extreme winter snows/cold weather. The winters of 70-72 were also extremely bitter. Could it be that by 20012 we will be in the middle of a perceived Global Freezing scare?
Wouldn’t surprise me at all.
15 posted on
12/18/2007 5:51:52 AM PST by
dbacks
(Taglines for sale or rent.)
To: Just mythoughts
''For more than a year, the sun has been experiencing a lull in activity, marking the end of Solar Cycle 23, which peaked with many furious storms in 2000--2003. "Solar minimum is upon us," he says.''
Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place? "Year"? Try "years."
Given that a solar cycle is about 11 years and the 23rd just ended, that means Solar Cycle 1 began 23*11 or 253 years ago. 2007-253 would make that ca 1754. Not unreasonable to think solar observations might have begun by then.
(Wikipedia notes the cycle was discovered mid-1800s, but extrapolated back to the mid-1700s using earlier observations.)
48 posted on
12/18/2007 6:56:50 AM PST by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Just mythoughts
When they started counting sunspots. 1790ish is when solar cycle 1 peaked.
83 posted on
12/18/2007 12:00:04 PM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
To: Just mythoughts
Solar magnetic cycles are said to be 11 years, although the full cycle is 22 years.
114 posted on
12/19/2007 10:26:04 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson