Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nation's Cops Applaud Presidential Candidate
http://www.commonvoice.com/ ^ | January 1, 2008 | Jim Kouri

Posted on 01/01/2008 5:43:14 PM PST by B4Ranch

Nation's Cops Applaud Presidential Candidate Jim Kouri January 1, 2008

While most of the politicians vying for their party's nomination for President of the United States pay lip service to the nation's law enforcement officers, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) is actually doing something to earn the respect and gratitude of America's cops, according to many police officers and organizations.

For example, the American Federation of Police -- with well over 100,000 members -- recently praised Ron Paul for introducing a bill that would help cops obtain topnotch body armor that would withstand rounds fired from most firearms. Rep. Paul's bill -- HR 3304 -- would amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide for a tax credit to law enforcement officers who purchase their own body armor.

"I urge all police officers and concerned citizens to contact their congressmen and ask them to support Rep. Paul's bill," said Deputy Sheriff Dennis Wise, president of the American Federation of Police.

"I would also like to applaud Congressman Ron Paul for his support and forward thinking in trying to help make law enforcement officers across our nation safer each day," said Wise.

Rep. Ron Paul appears to be popular with many US cops. "He's never found it necessary to force police officers to stand with him for photo opportunities the way other presidential candidates such as Hillary Clinton do," said New York Police Officer Edna Aguayo.

One police officer claims cops in New York and other states are forced to pose with the likes of Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain. If an officer refuses, he or she is charged with insubordination by their superiors.

"It's a joke how these cops are used as props during election campaigns. But Ron Paul doesn't pay cops lip service -- he actually works to help them enforce the law," said another cop forced to pose with Sen. Clinton during one of her staged "rallies."

Public opinion service Rasmussen Reports recently released data from its October 12-14 polling that indicates that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul leads his GOP opponents against Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton among likely voters ages 30-49. He is the leading White House contender for the key demographic, polling higher than Clinton among baby boomers. Congressman Paul polls in at 47%, compared with Clinton's 44%, among likely voters aged 40-49.

The 30-49 demographic has been a key indicator in recent elections, and one in which Republicans tend to fare well in hotly-contested elections. In 2004, exit polls reveal that George Bush beat John Kerry 53% to 46% among 30-44 year olds, and all accounts indicate that this will be the most instrumental demographic in the 2008 presidential election as well.

“Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who can beat Hillary Clinton,” claims political strategist Kent Snyder.

More than 3,000 police officers' lives have been saved by body armor since the mid-1970s when the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) began testing and developing body armor and performance standards for ballistic and stab resistance. Recognition and acceptance of the NIJ standard has grown worldwide, making it the performance benchmark for ballistic-resistant body armor.

Body armor can provide protection against a significant number of types of handgun ammunition, but law enforcement personnel must keep in mind that armor is categorized and rated for different threat levels. Additional protection should be worn for SWAT team operations, hostage rescues, or Special Operations assignments, when officers may be exposed to a weapon threat greater than the protection provided by regular duty armor, according to the National Institute of Justice.

Rank-and-file police officers also applaud Rep. Paul for his pro-sovereignty stance. "The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked," said the Texas congressman during a campaign rally.

In addition, Congressman Ron Paul believes that the Second Amendment is "not about duck hunting." It is an individual right that is guaranteed. He stated that he believes it is about the citizenry having the ability to restrain tyrannical governments and would be dictators.

He believes the Second Amendment is about self-defense from criminal attack and from governments that break away from the chains of the Constitution. According to a poll conducted by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, more than 75% of the nation's police officers agree with Rep. Paul's stance on gun ownership including private citizens carrying concealed weapons for personal protection.

Just recently Congressman Paul opposed the reauthorization of the Clinton-Feinstein semi-auto gun ban. He opposes gun and gunowner registration. And Paul opposes government permission systems that force law-abiding citizens "prove" their innocence before buying or owning firearms.

AFP president Dennis Wise agrees with Rep. Paul's stance on gun control. "When our founding fathers assembled to write one of the greatest papers ever written -- our Constitution -- they put down the amendments ... in the order of their importance," said Wise.

Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a staff writer for the New Media Alliance (thenma.org). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.

He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com and PHXnews.com. He's also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. He's appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. His book Assume The Position is available at Amazon.Com. Kouri's own website is located at http://jimkouri.us


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; cops; leo; paul; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2008 5:43:16 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Getting the SOP catcalls out of the way: Paul’s a nut, loon moonbat, lunatic, madman, traitor, freak, yada, yada, etc, ad nauseum.


2 posted on 01/01/2008 5:47:15 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Previous poster stole my thunder...hehe


3 posted on 01/01/2008 5:50:12 PM PST by Crim (Dont frak with the Zeitgeist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I’m sorry, but I read this and can’t help but think that now he’s passing bills trying to buy votes.


4 posted on 01/01/2008 6:00:37 PM PST by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crim

Wow. The dude wants to help the fascists who take away our Constitutional right to have drugs, and he calls himself a libertarian? Bummer, man.


5 posted on 01/01/2008 6:02:20 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

It’s kind of amazing that this nut, loon moonbat, lunatic, madman, traitor, freak, yada, yada, etc, ad nauseum has 20 million bucks in contributions.

I think it is humorous that the *core* is scared s#!tless of this old man. You do make a very fine effort at derision but I don’t think it’ll work.


6 posted on 01/01/2008 6:32:54 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

You miss understand, I wasn’t be derisive, I was just taking care of it on behalf of the herd here so there might possibly be a Paul thread with constructive debate instead of smears and insults.


7 posted on 01/01/2008 6:56:32 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

“Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who can beat Hillary Clinton,” claims political strategist Kent Snyder.”

I really believe this, I wish the Republican party could see it.


8 posted on 01/01/2008 6:59:27 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Cindy Sheehan likes him. Tells me all I need to know. He is a nutburger with cheese.


9 posted on 01/01/2008 7:00:46 PM PST by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost
Cindy Sheehan likes him. Tells me all I need to know. He is a nutburger with cheese.

Pretty sad Cindy Sheehan has so much control over you.

10 posted on 01/01/2008 7:02:35 PM PST by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: niki

LOL - apparently she controls a lot of people here.


11 posted on 01/01/2008 7:12:58 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0; Revelation 911
In that case allow me to steal one of
Revelation 911’s recent posts.
____________________________________________________________
I share our Founders’ belief that in a free society each citizen must have the right to keep and bear arms. They ratified the Second Amendment knowing that this right is the guardian of every other right, and they all would be horrified by the proliferation of unconstitutional legislation that prevents law-abiding Americans from exercising this right.
I have always supported the Second Amendment and these are some of the bills I have introduced in the current Congress to help restore respect for it:

H.R. 1096 includes provisions repealing the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act and the Federal Firearms License Reform Act of 1993, two invasive and unconstitutional bills.

H.R. 1897 would end the ban on carrying a firearm in the National Park System, restoring Americans’ ability to protect themselves in potentially hazardous situations.

H.R. 3305 would allow pilots and specially assigned law enforcement personnel to carry firearms in order to protect airline passengers, possibly preventing future 9/11-style attacks.

H.R. 1146 would end our membership in the United Nations, protecting us from their attempts to tax our guns or disarm us entirely.

In the past, I introduced legislation to repeal the so-called “assault weapons” ban before its 2004 sunset, and I will oppose any attempts to reinstate it.

I also recently opposed H.R. 2640, which would allow government-appointed psychiatrists to ban U.S. veterans experiencing even mild forms of Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome from ever owning a gun.

You have the right to protect your life, liberty, and property. As President, I will continue to guard the liberties stated in the Second Amendment.

-Ron Paul

....yeah - with policies like this it’s no wonder he’s called a kook (sarcasm)

33 posted on 01/01/2008 6:46:55 PM PST by Revelation 911

12 posted on 01/01/2008 7:34:04 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I’ve gotta ask. Ron Paul wants to eliminate nearly every fenderal agency because they arent enumerated in the constitution (FBI, DHS, DoE, etc). Okay, a principled libertarian viewpoint. But then there’s this. So where in the constitution does he find the authority to subsidize local police forces?


13 posted on 01/01/2008 8:23:50 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

LOL - that sounds like a group we have out here, but I think true.

As my son explained it to me, only a sheriff’s department and federal marshalls are authorized by the constitution. I’d have to look it up to see.


14 posted on 01/01/2008 8:29:17 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Dude, it isn’t that we are “scared” of RP; it is that he’s not a viable candidate on the Republican side. If he were he would scare me for 3 reasons; 1) Isolationism didn’t work before WWI 2) It didn’t work before WWII 3) It won’t work in the middle of WWIII!


15 posted on 01/01/2008 8:49:09 PM PST by logic101.net (Support OUR troops, NOT their's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Actually I doubt that it is the Agencies that have him upset, it is more likely that they can impose fines, fees and penalties on you and I without any review by Congress or any other elected persons.


16 posted on 01/01/2008 9:12:50 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

Allow me to assist you here, I am not a Dude. Generally older men don’t use the term because we know better.

Now, if you think RP is an isolationist perhaps you will give me your reasons for erroniously thinking so.


17 posted on 01/01/2008 9:28:05 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; Rb ver. 2.0

More kookiness......LOL

_______________________

“The biggest threat to your privacy is the government. We must drastically limit the ability of government to collect and store data regarding citizens’ personal matters.

We must stop the move toward a national ID card system. All states are preparing to issue new driver’s licenses embedded with “standard identifier” data — a national ID. A national ID with new tracking technologies means we’re heading into an Orwellian world of no privacy. I voted against the Real ID Act in March of 2005.

To date, the privacy focus has been on identity theft. It was Congress that created this danger by mandating use of the standard identifier (currently your SSN) in the private sector. For example, banks use SSNs as customer account identifiers because the government requires it.

We must also protect medical privacy. Right now, you’re vulnerable. Under so-called “medical privacy protection” rules, insurance companies and other entities have access to your personal medical information.

Financial privacy? Right now depositing $10,000 or more in cash in your local bank account will generate a federally-mandated report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network at the United States Department of the Treasury.

And then there’s the so-called Patriot Act. As originally proposed, it:

Expanded the federal government’s ability to use wiretaps without judicial oversight;
Allowed nationwide search warrants non-specific to any given location, nor subject to any local judicial oversight;
Made it far easier for the government to monitor private internet usage;
Authorized “sneak and peek” warrants enabling federal authorities to search a person’s home, office, or personal property without that person’s knowledge; and
Required libraries and bookstores to turn over records of books read by their patrons.
I have fought this fight for many years. I sponsored a bill to overturn the Patriot Act and have won some victories, but today the threat to your liberty and privacy is very real. We need leadership at the top that will prevent Washington from centralizing power and private data about our lives.” -Ron Paul


18 posted on 01/02/2008 4:09:04 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
So where in the constitution does he find the authority to subsidize local police forces?

Good question, if you consider a tax break a subsidization. Paul claims he wants to do away with the federal income tax altogether. If that were to happen, I presume that would be the end of all income tax breaks.

19 posted on 01/02/2008 4:17:10 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
One police officer claims cops in New York and other states are forced to pose with the likes of Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain. If an officer refuses, he or she is charged with insubordination by their superiors.

what a silly statement based on the musings of a single officer. being forces to stand with a political candidate is not a lawful order and any cop who was forced to do so would have a great lawsuit if they were punished.

NYPD officers are expressly forbidden to show support for a political candidate while in uniform or in any official capacity. another hack job by paul supporters.

20 posted on 01/02/2008 4:18:13 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson