Posted on 01/29/2008 9:00:54 AM PST by GOPBlonde
Election 2008 piece by Carol Devine-Molin For years I’ve been a fan of talk radio personality Rush Limbaugh, the “harmless lovable fuzzball”, and I’ve always enjoyed his humor and commentary. But recently, something has changed. He’s crossed a line. Limbaugh is now actively manipulating the Republican electorate in ways that are unacceptable for an entertainer, or even a self-styled ideologue and opinion shaper.
Rush regularly underscores that he’s a “movement conservative”, not a Republican partisan. That’s fine. But then he has the chutzpa to engage in heavy-handed tactics that are meant to skew the outcome of the GOP election process. Sometimes I feel like he’s morphing into a right-wing propaganda minister of the air-waves as he mercilessly beats on some candidates, and gives others (that he likes) a free ride. Rush is on a strange power-trip. As both a proud Reaganite Republican and conservative who operated at the grassroots, I really take umbrage with what he’s doing. The Republican Party is my party and the party of millions of other rank-and-file who love the GOP. Who the heck is Rush Limbaugh? This is a guy who probably didn’t even cast his first vote until he was thirty-five. Bombastic Limbaugh has even taken recent potshots at Republican stalwart Newt Gingrich. It’s time for El Rushbo to chill out.
True, Rush Limbaugh is among the most influential conservative voices on the political scene today. That makes it all the more disconcerting that Limbaugh is being patently irresponsible by spewing over-the-top rhetoric that could very well depress the Republican vote in the general election and thereby help elect a Democrat become the next president of this great nation. This is not a matter of free speech; Of course, the conservative poobah can make any public pronouncements that he wishes. But, by the same token, words have meaning and impact, and given the high stakes in this election, it’s difficult to see how Limbaugh is being properly circumspect. Yes, Rush, it’s your right to say anything you want, and it’s my prerogative to register my deep displeasure.
I’m in the awkward position of having to defend John McCain and Mike Huckabee against Rush Limbaugh’s rants, despite the fact that I will not be voting for either of these contenders in the primaries. That being said – even if it means crawling over broken glass or walking on a fire-bed of hot embers – I will do whatever it takes to pull that lever in the general election for the Republican candidate, whoever that might be. Why? Because the safety of this nation is paramount, and any of the Republican presidential hopefuls would do a better job as commander-in-chief during these perilous times than the Democrats in the offing. Moreover, the last thing that America needs is a bunch of blatant Nanny-state socialists expanding government and exerting further control over the citizenry.
Limbaugh recently stated: “What I said was that I, for the first time on this program, I can see possibly not voting for the Republican nominee.” On another occasion, Limbaugh was even more vociferous, as he espoused: “I’m here to tell you if either of these two guys [John McCain or Mike Huckabee] gets the nomination, it’s going to destroy the Republican Party, it’s going to change it forever, be the end of it. A lot of people aren’t going to vote. You watch.”
Well, what happens if either McCain or Huckabee survives Limbaugh’s onslaught and becomes the GOP candidate? That’s a distinct possibility for McCain, who is polling well and battling with Mitt Romney for the numero uno spot. Rush holds sway among conservative Republicans, and if he persists in his attacks against McCain, some conservatives will refuse to vote Republican in the general election if McCain is on the ballot.
As to the assertion that McCain or Huckabee will destroy the Republican Party if nominated, that’s sheer poppycock. Let’s face it; the GOP is already in flagrant disarray due to the policies of President George Bush who broke with conservative orthodoxy, and by extension, his party base. Upon his departure from office, conservative Republicans will look to reclaim the party. If Senator McCain intends to win the GOP primaries and the general election, he can only prevail by burnishing his conservative credentials and developing a special bond with the conservative grassroots. He may or may not be capable of accomplishing these things. In any vent, there’s a legitimate process in place that will vet McCain. Then let the chips fall where they may. Conservatives are smart people – They don’t need a crazed Limbaugh to repeatedly beat-up on McCain or any other GOP presidential aspirant.
Sadly, Chief Wagawaga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe is being both supercilious and short-sighted as he leads the pack against McCain and Huckabee. For Limbaugh, these two contenders must be quashed at all costs, utilizing his talk show power-pulpit to inflict devastating attacks. Limbaugh’s stridency begs the question: At this juncture, who is really having a deleterious effect upon the Republican Party? Limbaugh is acting like a petulant child, desperately attempting to get his way, even if it means overstepping his bounds and inflicting nasty targeted assaults upon GOP hopefuls.
Let me be clear: During this primary season, we should welcome debate and challenge the contenders on their ideas and records. However, it’s not necessary to go in for the jugular as Limbaugh is doing – He’s engaging in over-kill. That being said, really vicious assaults and infighting at the primary level don’t serve Republicans well. Why provide the Democrats with further ammunition to assail an already bloodied GOP candidate in the general election?
In the past, Limbaugh adroitly tapped into the fact that most Americans desperately wanted to attain victory in Iraq. Likewise, he should easily grasp that Republicans are extremely jazzed about the prospect of persevering against Hillary Clinton, the probable Democrat nominee. So the simple message to Rush is don’t unduly damage any of our GOP hopefuls. Let the primary process run its course.
However, there’s salient interference in the works from other quarters. It’s rather intriguing that the master political strategist himself, Bill Clinton, is out-and-about the media emphasizing that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are “good friends”. That, in concert with the recent New York Times endorsement of John McCain, appears calculated to impart the “kiss of death” on McCain, so that the Republican base will run tearing at their hair and screaming. Clearly, the Clintons and their liberal surrogates deem McCain a significant threat and they’re scheming to eject him from the political race. Ironically, despite Limbaugh’s efforts to harpoon McCain’s candidacy, it might be the finessing by the Clintons that does McCain in.
And, please, I’m not buying El Rushbo’s bogus claim that there isn’t a whit of difference between McCain and Hillary or Huckabee and Hillary. It’s Rush’s contention that they’re all the same. If either McCain or Huckabee become the GOP candidate, Rush would rather let the next presidency play out under the “Democrat’s watch”. He stated: “I think it would be easier to do that [advance a conservative agenda] with a Democrat president, given our choices here if it’s McCain or Huckabee.” This has been a rude awakening for me: Rush is no friend of the Republican Party. How dare he try to assiduously manipulate the GOP vote! And what has happened to his judgment!
For heaven’s sake, how could conservatives, in good conscience, accede to another Clinton presidency and place our Armed Forces in the hands of Leftists such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, who never properly respected the military and, in fact, hollowed it out and reduced its forces by half the last time they were in control of the White House! Rush, think about this clearly: You don’t care that our fine members of the military would again be used and abused by the Clintons? Moreover, the Clinton administration profoundly failed to address the growing problem of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda during the 1990s, which essentially unleashed the global terror war. Without question, America requires a leader that honors our military, and is fully prepared to fight Islamo-fascism. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out: Any of the GOP contenders would make a better commander-in-chief, than Hillary or Obama.
I frickin' HATE being right!
No offense, but I have listened to Rush since 1990 when I was in college. The way he gets his message across has not changed. What he’s doing today, he did back then. The only thing I can say I notice more is that there seems to be a small increase in the amount of commercials being run in each hour, but I don’t know if it’s just because I notice them more or if some of it is added hard breaks that are under station control...
In other words, "I'm for McCain."
******************
Exactly right.
Yes, both Rush and Sean are partners with Clear Channel. Rush says it’s nothing personal, no it’s business. And ego. Rush is determined to show the MSM that he’s a Kingmaker. Huckabee/McCain are not my candidates. But Rush has stepped over the line.
Free speech! Kiss my you-know-what.
Unless we're challenging Senator McCain, of course. In that case, we should just shut up...because that's being "divisive".
This is what Carol Devine-Molin wrote on Jan 14:
“The real thorn in the side of conservatives is John McCain. He represents a dilemma for conservatives during this election cycle since he’s gaining popularity, advancing nicely and excoriating him might actually backfire. How should conservatives tackle the McCain factor? Actually, there’s little that can be done. McCain’s a known commodity, and, arguably, conservative moaning and groaning will have little impact on his candidacy. He’s a complicated man that engenders both admiration and frustration among Republicans. Noteworthy, the odds are improving that he’ll “go the distance” in this race, whether conservatives like it to not.
Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see McCain on the GOP ticket running for president or being tapped for vice president. Not only is McCain very much admired for his integrity and character pursuant to his personal story of heroism in Vietnam, he’s widely seen as a national security expert that can keep America safe during this war-on-terror. People do remember that he consistently maintained that we needed more troops in Iraq in order to succeed, and he’s been thoroughly vindicated on that point.
Moreover, McCain’s fiscal ideas are clearly resonating with the electorate. As syndicated columnist and CNBC host Larry Kudlow noted in his 1/13/08 piece, “McCain’s message of cutting federal spending and eliminating budget earmarks is hitting home. More and more voters seem to be worried about excess government spending, and McCain remains the favorite on this issue. But McCain is now talking more like a spending and tax cutter, drawing the endorsement of time-tested supply-sider Jack Kemp and long-term deficit-spending foe Phil Gramm, the former Texas senator. Critically, McCain has pledged to make the Bush tax cuts permanent.”
This is not an endorsement of John McCain, just an acknowledgment that he’s progressing well in the polls and in public opinion. The GOP presidential nomination is still “up for grabs”, but a nominee will probably emerge in the not-too-distant future, by Super Tuesday, February 5th, or soon thereafter. That being said, conservative Republicans certainly don’t want to see our nominee, whoever that might be, excessively battered in the primary process. Yes, we that critique can offer up our points, but let’s exhibit a modicum of restraint, and tread more judiciously than usual. Tone it down a notch, so to speak. The liberals are counting on conservative in-fighting during the primaries to generate a damaged GOP candidate and more fodder to fling back at us in the general election. Let’s deprive them of their hot dream, at least to the degree that’s possible.”
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/cmolin/2008/cdm_01141.shtml
Link?
Oh no, not the "Mitt is Rush's boss" claim again.
This has really been bothering me lately to the point where I haven’t been listening to him.
What exactly is bothering you? That Rush is pointing out that McCain and Huckabee are not conservatives that will likely fracture the party?
Rush is stating fact. How is this even in dispute?
Is it just me? I’ve been a Free Republic conservative for many years, and I’m a tin foil hat guy...but I’m becoming VERY suspicious about all of these recent postings on FR.
What these postings have in common is that are not overtly pro-McCain (Because it is obvious that his record on illegal alien amnesty/taxes/global warming/campaign finance/judicial fillibusters are indefensible with conservatives) but are nonetheless designed to have the same effect - getting conservatives to consider the liberal Sen. McCain as an ACCEPTABLE GOP nominee (And the author who is ostensibly defending both “McCain and Huckabee” against Rush here is doing so as a diversion since it is clear that Huckabee has no realistic chance of winning the nomination) It’s not working with me, as I will never support him. Disregarding all of the other reasons, his amnesty support alone is a dealbreaker and will destroy the GOP and the country demographically in a very short time.
Is anyone sensing the same thing about some of these recent postings???
Just the other day I saw an article on here from some liberal saying “Talk radio has lost their influence!” Both can’t be right.
Because they are personal. I've never knew I that I would ever get more angry at and disappointed with Rush. Huck and McCain are no less desirable than the others. Why not attack them all equally? How can you pretend that Giuliani and Romney are conservative? The GOP and the Conservative Movement led by our beloved Rush, have beer bonged the Kool-Aid big time. We will drown in the Kool-Aid before we die of the poisoning.
Why can't we get anyone appropriate to run? We need to win the war on the gubenatorial level, in the Red states. When we choose good, conservative governors, we need to get a commitment from them to run for President. I thought Huckabee was close, but he rolled over too much for the liberal Dems/courts in Arkansas and sullied himself with the appearance of personal improprieties.
After Hunter wins the governors office in CA, he will be an excellent Presidential candidate.
Where wasMark Sanford!?!?!?! Why didn't he run?
Carol Devine-Molin?
My thoughts as well. A conservative Republican that is also a Hy-Fem?
Rudy drops out, and those votes go over to (dare I say his name)? Look at polls in electoral rich states such as NY and Calf. I’m just reporting what the landscape looks like. I am not voting for MC.
The hysteria here is almost humorous.
“”Limbaugh is now (shaping the opinion of) the Republican electorate in ways that are unacceptable for an opinion shaper”
Neither you nor anyone else on this thread who believes this way have been able to articulate a coherent reason to back this up.
In addition, the insintuation that Bain Capital buying Clear Channel has ANYTHING to do with this shows that neither you nor the author are legitimate Rush fans, so I (and most others here) find your opinion on the matter completely irrelevant.
No, Carol, Rush hasn’t stepped over any line. Rush is trying to save the GOP from itself. Perhaps your future rants should be directed at them, rather than at conservatives trying to keep the GOP honest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.