To: saganite
this would be the opposite of Perot in 92. Yep, that’d be the Dems trainwreck alright. I don’t believe they are THAT stupid... But you never know.
3 posted on
02/17/2008 11:45:06 PM PST by
Ymani Cricket
("It is my experience that Senators focus only on pleasing those who fund their campaigns" Obi-Wan)
To: Ymani Cricket
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that Obama would actually do this. I think he'd be more likely to wait four years and then cruise to victory after the spectacular failure of a Clinton or McCain term.
On the other hand, I find it very easy to believe that Bloomberg would have proposed this. Whether Obama would agree is another matter.
Regardless, I sure would like to see it happen.
5 posted on
02/17/2008 11:47:48 PM PST by
Junior_G
To: Ymani Cricket
I think any third party candidate will hurt the GOP more.
20 posted on
02/18/2008 12:28:18 AM PST by
nickcarraway
(I didn't leave the Republican Party, it left me)
To: Ymani Cricket
We can only hope and give a little whistle.
36 posted on
02/18/2008 2:43:15 AM PST by
Roy Tucker
("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
To: Ymani Cricket
......I don’t believe they are THAT stupid... But you never know......
It would appear that the good Mayor knows that the Senator from New York is an incompetent window dressing. He knows how ineffective she has been in getting him stuff and how arrogant she is when dealing with underlings. a a businessman, he knows that America can’t tolerate a full blown Marxist as President.
He is the man in Tienanmen Square standing in front of the tank
63 posted on
02/18/2008 6:25:57 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
To: Ymani Cricket
Understand. But it’s not about stupid. It’s about ego and thirst for power.
69 posted on
02/18/2008 7:00:53 AM PST by
Lee'sGhost
(Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson