The pastor and the senator--Too many ministers seem more interested in rhetoric than Gospel.

Arriving in Washington DC during the '80s, my most difficult challenge was finding a church home. Having grown up in the Pentecostal and Methodist faith, Sunday worship was a staple of my weekly routine. For almost 10 years I canvassed the nation's capital seeking a church that would take my fleshly failings and remind me of what our Creator expects of us as human beings.

What was consistent in going from pulpit to pulpit was that ministers were more interested in political rhetoric, the endorsement of political candidates and the denouncing of some government or community proposal, than the Gospel. It was disheartening for many years knowing that ministers were not teaching or preaching the word of God, that their sermons were becoming political rallies. I was stunned by the relentless blame cast upon the white man, by the rhetoric of racial divisiveness and the emphasis on things that seemed to separate us from our neighbors.

Then, in 1995, I attended First Baptist Church in DC, where the Rev. Frank Tucker presided, and my spirit finally found what it was seeking. I will never forget meeting with the pastor prior to joining and expressing my feelings about what I was looking for in a church. I made it clear that my interest was in the word of God and not in political rallies, condemnation of America, and various politicians occupying the pulpit on Sunday. He shared my concerns and promised that this wasn't the case at his church.

I've been a member of Pastor Tucker's church for about 13 years now, and he's never disappointed my spiritual yearning. Through the years I've taken whites, Muslims, Jews and people of all walks of life to worship with me, and they all have left feeling that they could join the pastor's congregation.

RELATED Only cynics close their eyes to reality Obama spurns Pastor's 'distorted' views but won't disown him Former Bush spokesman slams Obama over pastor

THERE ARE still black churches and mosques today that identify with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's anti-American, hypocritical sermons. During the '50s, '60s and '70s, the black church was a place where blacks could gather and unite away from the harshness and brutality of racism and vicious hatred. It was a place where ministers could help their congregations express their anger and frustration at white America's ungodliness toward their black brethren. Many ministers during those tumultuous times were considered heroes and pillars of the community for they were preaching against an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

People like Jeremiah Wright are still preaching as though we're in the '50s or '60s, and are locked in this time warp. They refuse to elevate and celebrate the progress of America and acknowledge that presidential candidate Barack Obama's campaign is evidence of that amazing paradigm shift.

It strikes me as impossible for Senator Barack Obama and his wife to have patronized Rev. Wright's church for so many years and not embraced his teachings and vision of America. My minister has always had a profound impact on my outlook on life and has strengthened my spirit to forgive the transgressions of this world and not induce more hate and separation.

I find it difficult to believe Senator Obama when he tells us that he was unaware of his pastor's vicious message from the pulpit, and that had he known it, there would have been condemnation. Many black intellectuals are still angry over what they perceive as the continuous crippling effect of racism and slavery in America on their careers. The irony is that many of their children have embraced the United States, finding success and prosperity, while their parents continue to allow their wounds to be perpetuated in this hopeless mind-set preached from the pulpit.

Michelle Obama's expression of how, for the first time, she was proud of America, was indicative of the influence of her pastor.

SENATOR OBAMA should admit that since his campaigning he's seen a different America. He must show that he rejects and repudiates this negative school of thinking. Furthermore, he should state that no one should be a member of churches or mosques which preach such hatred and conspiratorial thinking, continuously emphasizing the worst in our country and not the phenomenal progress made.

This past week was not an exemplary moment for the man who has prided himself on integrity and honesty throughout this campaign. The fact is that the senator has no plausible excuse for why he remained a member of Rev. Wright's church. He and his family should have immediately left that congregation for the embrace of a church that teaches the Bible rather than the alienation, lunacy and outright mockery of Christian teachings.

It was impossible for my spirit to endure these churches, as can be evidenced by my negative descriptions of them. It makes no sense for someone in search of America's promise and potential to worship in a place where a doctrine of hatred is the central theme. I was taught that church was a place of escape and rest; I didn't want someone who is supposed to be a religious leader feeding me poisonous information.

My reason for going to church has always been for a spiritual recharge, not more of the same; I deal with politics 24/6, and one day a week I get a chance to take a break from all that. I believe this to be healthy, and think it sad that I had to try so hard, for so long, to find a church able to provide the rest or Sabbath mentioned in the Bible.

No one need be forced to settle for a church that proffers divisive politics in place of spiritual succor. Senator Obama seems only belatedly to have discovered this simple reality.

The day must surely come when churches - black or otherwise - which preach hate will return to the Word.

I can sympathize with the writer. I too spent several years once moving here, looking for a church I was comfortable in and that met my expectations of the kind of church I grew up in.

I've found most have gone very liberal, less Bible and more everything else. Too many are against Israel and sympathetic to the Pals.

They have 1 1/2 hour sermons, the first half hour is on "giving", then on to everything but the teaching of Christ.

The music is no longer gospels but "modern" music to be read off a big screen with no real message or inspiration, which leaves me empty.

I always leave disappointed. I have walked out of some in the middle because it all felt so wrong.

I don't think religion and politics can, or should be separated. What rules your heart should rule your actions. As an example, if God says you shall not murder, that commandment must be carried out outside the church on other days than Sunday. If someone at my church had a Clinton bumper sticker on their car, I was the first to remind them that they supported infant murder and sodomy. If that didn't do the trick, then a list followed such as, fornication and adultery, and lying. If that didn't work yet, you could follow up with denying God to our children in school, wanting to exterminate the Word of God in conversation, and eliminating His name on the money, etc. How much proof do they need that the spirit of Anti-Christ abides in them?

The point would be that their politics COULD NOT be separated from their belief system. You either believe, or you vote Democrat, you can't do both. With the advent of abortion politics, you have a BRIGHT line drawn in front of believers. I am an evangelical protestant, so this is easy for me. We were given the example at the Church of Corinth as an example to follow with open sin in the church. I can't understand the other denominations, especially Catholics, that allow the separation of belief's in their denomination. If a person is known to support liberal views, they should be excommunicated. To not do so seems an admission that the church is more concerned with keeping numbers or tithers. How can you preach Sunday after Sunday against something and have pew warmers defy the Word of God? These are not obscure controversial subjects for Christians. I think most preachers would say abortion, sodomy, adultery, lying, and fornication are pretty much black and white subjects. Even Jews surprise me knowing Democrats will turn on Israel and support the terrorists at the drop of a hat.

The religious lines were drawn thousands of years ago. Jesus made it plain that He requires us to follow Him in life after we repent, so these are not new or controversial subjects in church. If you say you are a believer, yet you are still willingly sinning, you are still in rebellion. We all slip and fall, but to even deny sin is sin, is a sign of rebellion. Voting Democrat and claiming Christ is an oxymoron. If the only difference between Democrats and Republicans and Independents was how much the tax rate should be, then we could argue that a Christian could be any political view and still be a believer. When one party wants to remove God from conversation, kill babies, favor sodomy, fornication, adultery, et al, then a Christian MUST flee from said politics. A believer is given the Holy Spirit to be able to discern these things.

PS. Just as an aside, if the Republican party decides to remove certain planks from its platform, Christians will leave it also. We don't vote Republican by default, We vote conservative because Jesus was conservative and His Word requires us to have conservative views. His Word is eternal and never changing.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.