Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas polygamists may recant, officials say
MSNBC/AP ^ | 04/12/2008 | AP

Posted on 04/12/2008 1:33:03 PM PDT by Doneit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-332 last
To: UCANSEE2
First, I did NOT get any message from other posters. I think for myself, as anyone who knows me would agree.

Doneil's message could have been clearer than it was. One could be left wondering what he saw as a "sordid mess". Was it government interference (a gov't which has made very bad judgements in the past), or was Doneil referring to the Eldorado polygamist colony as a "sordid mess"?

I don't believe I ever accused Doneil of supporting the practices of the FLDS. Yet, Doneil gave the impression this particular cult, including the children, shouldn't trust the government no matter what the FLDS forced on them.

321 posted on 04/14/2008 11:08:18 PM PDT by IIntense (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: IIntense

“First, I did NOT get any message from other posters. I think for myself, as anyone who knows me would agree.”

I apologize for the assumption.


“I don’t believe I ever accused Doneil of supporting the practices of the FLDS.”

You weren’t even there when it happened, how could you?

I was trying to explain to you what had transpired on the thread, and ended up leaving you thinking I blamed you also.
My fault. I went into details you probably don’t even care about.


“Yet, Doneil gave the impression this particular cult, including the children, shouldn’t trust the government no matter what the FLDS forced on them.”

It is DONEIT, btw.
I just don’t get that out of post 1. Not one word in those sentences indicates the poster said that.

The poster said the government was a larger problem, not a more important one.

Now, other posters tried to accuse me, and DONEIT of saying that, when it is not at all in evidence.


“Doneil’s message could have been clearer than it was. “

Well, therein lies the ‘sin’ that DONEIT and I were condemned and hung for. (and I don’t mean by you)

Which is what I was trying to explain to you, and failed miserably.


322 posted on 04/14/2008 11:32:09 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Doneit

In light of todays court ruling, you owe DONEIT an apology.


323 posted on 05/22/2008 4:53:16 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (OVERPRODUCTION......... one of the top five worries for American farmers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I was just going back to my infamous thread and reading it. What a laugh. The hysteria and ridiculousness of some of these comments really made me laugh - Quite a lot!

Your commentary was spot on and I really find it amazing that some of these people couldn't understand my point.

Reminds me of the ‘Twilight Zone’ episode where a neighborhood goes crazy because they think and alien has landed and one of them is it! LOL

FRegards,
Tcats

324 posted on 05/22/2008 8:13:53 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TCats

“Reminds me of the ‘Twilight Zone’ episode where a neighborhood goes crazy because they think and alien has landed and one of them is it!”

The Monsters are Due on Maple Street.


325 posted on 05/22/2008 8:42:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
LOL - As usual, Maple St., absolutely correct.

I just read the rest of the posts in this thread (Those after I was banned) and it is utterly amazing (And, on some level, amusing). Man, you went to all kinds of effort to educate these folks and they still didn't get it. Truly pitiful.

The post about three up from this one, from Balding Eagle, to some of the hysterical ‘Moms’ requesting an apology in light of today's ruling is especially satisfying. I doubt any will bother though - They appear much more adept at simple emotional attack and less inclined for the rational apology.

Cheers

326 posted on 05/22/2008 9:19:02 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: TCats

“They appear much more adept at simple emotional attack and less inclined for the rational apology.”

yeah, but the applies to both ‘sides’.

And still, I insist, we are all on the same side.

we have different points of view, different amounts and types of information in our heads, and at our fingertips.

We each have our own special ‘concerns’, which dominate the area we try to ‘defend’.

Each day is a new day, and I try to ‘start over’ when it comes to returning a post. (confusing?) What I mean is I try to harbor no grudge. TRY. I’m not perfect at it, but I try.

I think more posters are doing that, as time goes on with these threads. Once some of the ‘missing’ pieces of the puzzle are filled in (evidence, testimonies, DNA test results, charges, arrests) then maybe some of the conflict will disappear, and we will all be united again.


The LAW is in risky territory on this case, but it must be dealt with. Sooner or later, a case like this was going to occur in some state.

Now, it has occurred, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out.


327 posted on 05/22/2008 9:33:00 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
....wait....#*&#&.....Ok. it's fixed.

"yeah, but that applies to both ‘sides’."

328 posted on 05/22/2008 9:38:11 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The LAW is in very risky territory indeed!

It appears to me as a simple case of the end justifying the means in that they used information that was very likely trumped up (Maybe even by themselves) but that gave them some cover to go in, right a wrong, and, in the process, uproot hundreds of peoples lives in the pursuit of the guilty.

That is the basis for my original post - That the government may very likely be the source of the greater evil and will perpetrate this evil in the name of ‘Protecting’ us from another evil. Hitler was most adept at this type of shell game. He rode it quite far.

329 posted on 05/22/2008 9:50:16 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
P.S. The only emotion to the detriment of fact/logic that I saw was limited to the ‘other’ side of the argument (A lot of ‘Moms’ in this group BTW)
330 posted on 05/22/2008 9:53:08 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: TCats

That may well be.

If there are some charges filed, and arrests made, then we will know a lot more about whether this was trumped up or not.

OPTIONS:

None of it’s true, and the CPS made it all up. So did the WELFARE folks who reported abuse to the CPS, and the girls who made statements to CPS workers indicating abuse lied.

Some, or all of it’s true, and they will be able to prove it.

Some or all of it’s true, and the FLDS got rid of the evidence, and the case will be dropped.


331 posted on 05/22/2008 10:28:42 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: TCats

Well, I’ve been on pretty much all the threads, and no one is innocent.

I’ve also said this before, the fact that a lot of ‘moms’ would enter the discussions with an attitude of protect the children first, when confronted with stories that old men were having sex with minors, just seems completely logical.

It’s like when females say some guy is ‘creepy’.

That means something different than it does to us men.

Everyone has their own ‘point of view’. I do my best to understand it, and try to refrain from criticizing it.

And emotion can be generated by being attacked, as you and I well know.

And emotion is something that happens in place of fact/logic.

Anyway, I think we are all humans, and we all should treat each other with respect, and I do my best to apologize when I don’t.

It is this case, and all the ‘hot buttons’ it contains, that is the problem, and not so much a case of ‘bad’ posters.


332 posted on 05/22/2008 10:40:20 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-332 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson