Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tlj18
Whoa! They almost landed outside the landing ellipse. Probably because the parachute opened later than expected?

I think the more appropriate comment here is, "Wow... they landed INSIDE of the ellipse!"

I understand complex mathematics. I understand physics and chemistry. My brain, unfortunately, can't put the two of them together in a functional way. To see this sort of accuracy, landing a dishwasher on a rock that's over 230 million miles away, blows my freaking mind.

31 posted on 05/26/2008 6:36:13 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / MOLWN LABE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia
Yes, it is absolutely incredible that we can do that, send a machine several hundred million miles, then flawlessly land on a specific area on a planet that is not currently friendly to human life. And I do mean flawlessly. But the fact is, that is what I expect from our space program. I expect to see American excellence on each mission, and that is exactly what we see on most missions. There have been 12 attempts to land on Mars. It breaks down to 7 attempts by Americans, and 5 by other nations. Six of our attempts have been successful, while only one non-American attempt. It's not luck; we are just that good.
37 posted on 05/26/2008 7:12:08 AM PDT by tlj18 (Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson