Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: singfreedom

And how’s that different then, say, a 35 year old producing porn featuring a 20-something? Child pornography laws are meant to reflect the age of consent in pornography.

If they got those picture in a sneaky way (ie. going into girls’ bathrooms and stalking them) then they should face the same punishments that adults would for doing such acts to fellow adults, not because of the age of the person. If we try a minor with laws that are meant to enforce age group boundaries between minors/adults, then we are pushing the laws beyond their original intent, and beyond our cultural normalities as people within age groups.

To charge a minor as if he/she is an adult on “To Catch a Predator” is like arresting teens both under the age of consent just for having sex.


28 posted on 06/04/2008 8:07:38 PM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: abt87

For a girlfriend and boyfriend to exchange photos is one thing. When a former boyfriend (or girlfriend), in a fit of petty pique, posts explicit photos of his/her underage “friend” on the Internet, yes, I think there should be a severe penalty. In this instance they are not just harming themselves, but exposing the other party to danger from REAL pedophiles.


30 posted on 06/04/2008 8:27:52 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson