[Rick.Donaldson]

If, for the sake of argument, it were “out of whack” how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?

[mosaicwolf]

If, for the sake of argument, it were “out of whack” how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?

Raise taxes.....how else would we put it back in whack?

[pgyanke]

If, for the sake of argument, it were “out of whack” how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?

Give a dog a bone?

[TChris]

If, for the sake of argument, it were “out of whack” how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?

Obiviously, the same way that we're "fixing" Global Warming^TM: Give other countries the authority to tax US Citizens via the UN, then give the money to China, add "Solar Minimum" regulations of various flavors to every conceivable industry and blame the whole mess on Bush.

That's how problems are fixed in these parts.

[HardStarboard]

>>>how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?<<<

Silly question....buy carbon credits from Al Gore's company!

From earlier World Net Daily article...

Generation Investment Management's U.S. branch is headed by a former Gore staffer and fund-raiser, Peter S. Knight, who once was the target of probes by the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice.

Hobbs points out Gore stands to make a lot of money from his promotion of the alleged "global warming" threat, which is disputed by many mainstream scientists.

"In other words, he [Gore] 'buys' his 'carbon offsets' from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself," Hobbs writes. "To be blunt, Gore doesn't buy 'carbon offsets' through Generation Investment Management – he buys stocks."

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

"If, for the sake of argument, it were “out of whack” how would one put in back “in whack” anyway?"

Call the sun-busters on the Icarus 2. They know just how to put everything back in whack.