Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theBuckwheat
The velocity of the embrace is proportional to how well it agrees with the Current Wisdom.

I'm not so sure. I think there are a lot of embarrassed scientists who are looking for an objective way to change their minds about global warming.

20 posted on 07/12/2008 11:05:08 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Chaguito; All

Dont forget too, that the temp of the water directly affects the amount of CO2 it can hold in solution. its an inverse relationship, the colder the water the more it holds. The warmer the water, the more it releases, and it wont absorb as much. As that water moves south, and warms up, the Co2 entrained will begin to come out of solution and back into the atmosphere. Id love to see the volumes of Co2 in THAT particular water sample, I bet its almost fizzy like beer!


21 posted on 07/12/2008 11:11:41 PM PDT by intenseracer (Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Chaguito
>>
I think there are a lot of embarrassed scientists who are looking for an objective way to change their minds about global warming.
<<

We can only hope they find a way to work up the courage to join the popular crowd that is hell-bent on proving AGW no matter what and follow where the facts have always pointed, no matter what the professional consequences.

Because liberals (even liberal scientists) lack principles, their decision-making processes don't have a “tipping point” as much as they they have a “flipping point”, where they suddenly feel compelled to support something they previously had worked against.

25 posted on 07/13/2008 6:03:15 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson