Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: outofsalt
I was hoping for a mini Maunder.

I sure as heck don't. Even a Daulton-level minimum could lead to the stavation death of millions. That's too high a price to pay to prove the global warming weenies wrong. The tide is starting turn against them anyway.

4 posted on 08/02/2008 10:50:25 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Short bussed. Very strange considering how big the Global Warming issue is on the BBS.


5 posted on 08/02/2008 10:54:14 AM PDT by RightWhale (Exxon Suxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

If we assume that the temperature records correlate with sunspot intensity, we can in rough terms assume that the 180-year cycle dominated from about 1100 to 1450 and the 220-year cycle dominates from 1650 to 2100. Stuiver-Brazuiunas analysis (ch. 7.4) also indicates this possibility. The previous 1000 years look like a mirror from this. The 2*180 year period seems to begin and end with a warm period and the 2*220 year period seems to begin and end with a cold period. The length of this period is one Gleissberg. The next cold period should begin about 2020. http://personal.inet.fi/tiede/tilmari/sunspot8.html#hyps2289


8 posted on 08/02/2008 1:55:37 PM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; RightWhale; outofsalt; SunkenCiv; blam; All

I recently attended a lecture by a well informed solar scientist. He said predictions are that we will have several years of cooler weather, then warm up again quite a bit.


16 posted on 08/05/2008 1:08:40 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson