Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will "Private" Oil Sink the NYMEX? (End of fungible oil)
www.investmentu.com/ ^ | 08-2008 | Stewart Miller and the Investment U Research Team

Posted on 08/16/2008 2:18:24 PM PDT by dennisw

Crude Oil Forecast

Will "Private" Oil Sink the NYMEX?

Oil-Rich And Oil-Hungry Governments Are Ditching Conventional Markets And Locking Up Reserves… Here's How They Could Permanently Destabilize the Price of Crude

An Investment U White Paper Report
by Stewart Miller and the Investment U Research Team


The world's largest governments are drastically changing the way they buy and sell oil. And it could affect every family, small business and multibillion-dollar corporation across the globe…

So far, this historic shift has been scarcely reported. But the transformation is undoubtedly underway, and quietly altering the future of energy.

Rapid economic expansion in Russia, India and, most importantly, China, has led the governments in these countries to review their traditional sources of oil, and to make substantial changes in the way they get it.

And they've opted to circumvent the traditional distribution networks of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), and other bourses, entirely.

In fact, they're undermining them, "locking up" supplies by purchasing crude from oil-producing countries directly - behind closed doors:

This strategy is coming to be known as "Energy Mercantilism." Producers - and consumers - are bypassing the marketplace altogether. And it's taking massive quantities of oil off the open market.

Now, the crude oil market's forecast is wide open. The free markets that have historically determined the pricing and allocation of oil are in sudden danger of extinction. And with them, competitive prices for U.S. consumers…

State-Run Oil Will Dominate the World Energy Market

In the past, the world has relied on an open marketplace to set the price of energy. For decades, the NYMEX has been the epicenter of energy trade.

But China and India, in cooperation with a key supplier, Russia, have turned the tables by making bi-lateral agreements to lock in long-term supplies at set prices, or by forming consortiums to guarantee supply.

China has become the world's second-largest importer of oil. And the U.S. Energy Department estimates that the country's demand will more than double, to 14.2 million barrels a day, by 2025. More than two-thirds of that will be imported.

Currently, China builds cities the size of New York twice a year.
 
Every time a new barrel of oil is discovered, the world uses four existing barrels. But China and India's demand for oil is still in its infancy - around 1.3 barrels per person per year, compared to 4.4 barrels per person per year in the developed world. 

When their economies begin using 2.4 barrels per annum per person, they'll need 24 billion barrels of oil a year - double the current amount consumed worldwide.

What's important to emphasize is that in this new Energy Mercantilism, oil prices are locked-in, no matter how the market fluctuates in the future. That means not everyone will pay the same price for oil, fundamentally altering the dynamics of the energy marketplace. It directly counters market pricing, and destabilizes the supply/distribution channels that currently determine who can afford oil.

And These "Private" Oil Deals Are Beginning To Roll in…

- In Russia, Vladimir Putin has been squeezing Europe by withholding supplies of natural gas while negotiating for exclusive pipeline deals. In 2003, he dismantled the Yukos oil group who had expanded dealings with the West. He has explicitly stated that Russia will demand bilateral long-term supply contracts with consuming nations, so Russia could guarantee stable demand for its exports.

- China National Petroleum Corp. has entered joint development agreements with Sudan, which is forecasted to produce as much as 300,000 barrels per day by the end of 2006. Another Chinese firm, Sinopec Corp., is erecting a pipeline from that complex to Port Sudan on the Red Sea, where the Chinese are building a tanker terminal for shipping raw crude to the Chinese mainland. Altogether, Sudan, despite conducting what is widely regarded as genocidal warfare not far from the oilfields, provides 10% of Chinese petroleum imports.

- In November 2005, Chinese President Hu Jintao toured Latin America and completed a number of economic deals, including an oil deal with Argentina. Hugo Chavez, the President of Venezuela, has said Chinese firms would be allowed to operate 15 mature oil fields in eastern Venezuela, which could produce more than one billion barrels. Chavez has also invited Chinese firms to bid for natural gas exploration contracts.

- Sinopec, China's state-owned oil giant, signed a $70 billion deal with the Iranians in November 2004 to develop the Yadavaran oil field.  Sinopec will also buy 250 million tons of liquefied natural gas over 30 years.  Iran is committed to export 150,000 barrels per day of crude oil to China for 25 years.

- Recent testimony before the Congressional Committee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, outlined how China's three state-owned oil companies "have managed to establish control over about 3 mb/d [million barrels a day] of crude production, which could reach up to 6 mb/d by 2008."

The fact is, 90% of world reserves are controlled by national oil companies, as opposed to market-driven public companies.

Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM), for example, is the largest publicly traded oil company. And it ranks only 14th in proven reserves, directly below 13 national oil companies, including those of Iran, Venezuela, and other governments overtly unfriendly to the U.S.

Forecasting Crude Oil… The Bottom Line

A task force for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a highly respected Washington think tank, recently released a report that contains dire predictions for our economy and global oil markets.

Led by ex-CIA chiefs John Schlesinger and John Deutsch, the group reports that the United States will be unable to achieve energy independence any time in the foreseeable future, even with massive injections of ethanol, wind power and other alternative fuels.

Noting the potential ramifications of Energy Mercantilism, it recommends radical conservation initiatives, possibly including higher gasoline taxes and gasoline rationing. 

It also calls for the implementation of "an active public policy… to correct these market failures that harm U.S. economic and national security."

"Most oil and gas resources," the report states, "are controlled by state-run companies, some of which enter into supply contracts with consumer countries that are accompanied by political arrangements that distort the proper functioning of the market."

Conclusion on Crude Oil and the NYMEX
 
The fact is, more and more oil buyers and sellers are hooking up directly, outside of the marketplace. And in many cases, they're including other "payments" into the transactions - direct investment, infrastructure development, political favors, trade agreements, etc.

And therein lies the uncertainty. How does one know if he's paying the going rate for oil when a going rate doesn't exist?

Don Miller, Investment U Researcher


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; energyfacts; energyprices; geopolitics; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: dennisw

>>None is sold abroad

How about none of the profits from American Oil go abroad either?

Seems like ending the flow of American petrodollars that are currently filling the coffers of our enemies would be a Good Thing(tm).


41 posted on 08/16/2008 5:46:41 PM PDT by LomanBill (A bird flies because the right wing opposes the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Led by ex-CIA chiefs John Schlesinger and John Deutsch, the group reports that the United States will be unable to achieve energy independence any time in the foreseeable future, even with massive injections of ethanol, wind power and other alternative fuels.

Now I know who were the scare mongers were at an energy conference a few months ago, my newsletter only idenified them as ex CIA directors.

42 posted on 08/16/2008 5:53:21 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Earth First...we will drill the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

“I’m thinking Japan prior to WW2.,,,,”

That’s been running through my mind all week....Japan began its Southeast Asia adventures in th 1930’s looking for cheap oil...


43 posted on 08/16/2008 5:54:41 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

This article is several years old. Any thoughts on the predictions for 2006?


44 posted on 08/16/2008 6:19:19 PM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sbMKE

Good Catch

Energy Mercantilism… Is “Private Oil” Threatening the NYMEX?
http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2007/20070125.html
January 25, 2007


45 posted on 08/16/2008 7:00:52 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: thackney

>But it is not shipped to most US refineries, just the West Coast ones that are far closer than Japan.

Not sure I agree that Southern Cal is ‘far closer than Japan’, but at least at one time, I think Alaska produced more oil than could be refined on the West Coast.


46 posted on 08/16/2008 7:14:45 PM PDT by chipengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chipengineer
Not sure I agree that Southern Cal is ‘far closer than Japan’,

It is 3,577 miles from Valdez, Alaska to Tokyo, Japan.

It is 2,253 miles from Valdez, Alaska to El Segundo, California (major refinery near Los Angeles)

I think 1,324 miles is pretty far, more than half the distance to Southern California and more than the distance to the closest refinery outside of Alaska.

It is 1,274 miles from Valdez, Alaska to Anacortes, Washington. (largest Washington refinery)

http://www.findlocalweather.com/how_far_is_it/ak/valdez.html

but at least at one time, I think Alaska produced more oil than could be refined on the West Coast.

Yes, from 1996 to 2000, about 5.5% of the Alaskan North Slope oil was exported outside the US.

47 posted on 08/16/2008 7:26:30 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson