[jmpmstr4u2]

How DARE he or anyone else question the Inventor of the Internet!!!!

[Always Right]

Sir Abert Gore winner of the Nobel Peace Prize has said the debate is over. Only a bigotted person is not voting for Obamessiah would continue to argue faced with that overwhelming fact.

[lesser_satan]

BTTT

[Flycatcher]

“That’s why the IPCC should never be viewed as a scientific manual. It was created for the sole purpose of supporting the notion of human-induced climate change.”

We have a winner!

[AU72]

“Ready the “Comfy Chair” for the heretic”

[CedarDave]

PING!

[steelyourfaith]

 

Global Warming Scam News & Views

• FightGlobalWarmingLies
• THE GLOBAL WARMING HERETIC
• Beam me to Planet Gore !
• WeatherQuestions.Com (Dr. Roy Spencer, Official Climatologist, EIB Network)
• Reasoned Thinking Comes From Cooler Heads
• Schnitt's Global Warming Files
• Rush Limbaugh's E-Stack "Global Warming Hoax & Religion of Environmentalism" (Rush 24/7 subscription required)
• Craig James 24 Hour News 8 Blog
• Icecap

Entrepreneur's Compilation of
The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet

• Part I ............. Documentaries
• Part II ...................... Lectures
• Part III ...................... Debates
• Part IV ............. Short Videos
• Part V ........................ Humor
• Part VI...Updates & Additions

[SoConPubbie]

And yet, STILL, our presumptive nominee, John McCain, still is in total support of this scam of the Marxists/Liberals.

[xcamel]

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video

Not Evil Just Wrong (mash here)

---

[RJL]

New Report Calls into Question ‘Man-Made’ Climate Change

New scientific evidence suggests there is a stronger link between solar activity and climate trends on Earth than there is with greenhouse gases...

Al Gore and his Solar Deniers aren't going to like this!

[TChris]

Wow.

The sun is more powerful than my SUV? Who knew?

[ChildOfThe60s]

based on actual observations, rather than scientific models

Now there is a novel approach. Empiricism.

Lot harder to monkey with [properly] observed data than it is to juice up your computer model to get predetermined, desired results.

[astyanax]

I saw the post, swear it said 'CBS News' and almost spit coffee...

[xtinct]

New scientific evidence stronger link between solar activity and climate trends on Earth ... resulting in climate change

dang... who'da thought my second grade nun was right... the sun causes climage change...

the point was driven home in Meteorology 101 at JHU...

[.44 Special]

Duh!

Anyone that ever bothered to study science in high school should have been able to deduce for themselves the power of the Sun.

After the fall of monolithic communism the left moved post haste into the green movements. The desired result was to create issues that would immobilize western governments. They found their holy of holies in the global warming scam.

After all individuals can do nothing in this respect so it was time for big government to move in:

1) more taxes to fight global warming
2) more control of the population

It worked for the lefties.

Just goes to show you that common sense and hard science are no hopers in the battle with the lying left. We’re going to have to get down in the mud and make them play our game.

[HerrBlucher]

There is no way the sun has any affect on climate./s

[Publius6961]

The new data call into question whether scientific evidence shows that global warming is a man-made phenomenon and suggests that natural forces, as opposed to human activity, may drive global climate change.

So does the old data, virtually without exception.

Anyone with half a brain and access to the climate records of the last 400,000 years (or 10,000,000) can see for themselves that although man must certainly have an impact, as does every living thing, it is so minuscule as to be pragmatically zero.

Why does this continue to be "news?"

Isn't 400,000 years enough to make it 'same ol'-same-ol'?"

[crazycat]

The Sun changes the temperature by factors as large as 10 or 20 times every day, as night time turns to daytime, so how it can be ignored as the largest factor is insane.

Only if it put out a constant amount of radiation, could it be ignored.

[Publius6961]

“That’s why the IPCC should never be viewed as a scientific manual. It was created for the sole purpose of supporting the notion of human-induced climate change [political, centralized world-wide social and economic manipulation].”

There.
Fixed it for them.

[Old Professer]

Even though it took two hours, I read the full report by Singer and the NIPCC; every major inconsistency is pointed out in detail and described and every bit of trickery in the IPCC assessments is disclosed showing full well that the whole thing is a political device and not a scientific analysis of even the available data.

AGW lives only in the mind of the models.