Posted on 10/12/2008 6:15:14 AM PDT by kellynla
Aren't "Sanctuary Cities" actually against the law themselves?
“...impeach him...”
With all due respect, and my ability to poke a little fun sometimes...
Did I take a nap and wake up on November 5th???
The fat lady has not sung...........yet...;-)
I would assume it would be better to not to have to impeach, and make sure the lesser of two evils gets the nod this time...again...
Besides...There is NO WAY we will even see impeachment proceedings even be brought up in congress ever during a potential Obama administration...
Just my opinion...
Ummm, that is what I was saying. No one would dare do it.
The Terry Anderson Show...
Tonight Terry will give us a Mountain of Excuses...
Call Terry LIVE 9-10 PM PST at (866) 870-57521
LIVE stream at http://krla870.townhall.com/
http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/index.php?cmd=listenliv
I think that's because "we" still hope they will grow up to be loyal Democrat voters some day. And if not, hey, they are useful to scare the "rich" into demanding a bigger and stronger government to deal with them. ;)
more importantly, gang members parents and other family members vote Democrat - virtually exclusively. Throwing the nephew or son in jail tends to piss off your voter base.
Wasn’t Williams one of those that got caught writing for pay for the White House a few years ago? It’s about time he noticed there was a sanctuary city problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.