The money quote is the final sentence of the report.
"It may be that more global warming doubters are surfacing because there just isn't any global warming."
Therefore I could not beat the response by " osaycanuc"
"Can't you just hear the hot air whooshing out of this balloon? PHSSSSSSSSST! To wit, the lack of comments here, where one might normally expect to see a torrent - nay a geyser! - of piqued opinion as to the relative science around either side.
Checkmate, anti-capitalist, anti-consumerist, anti-carbon buffoons. Your bandwagon is running out gas!"
1 posted on
10/20/2008 9:54:53 AM PDT by
managusta
To: managusta
Globally, volcanoes put out far more CO2 annually than does industry and motor vehicles. I don't see anyone suggesting we outlaw volcanoes.
2 posted on
10/20/2008 10:03:33 AM PDT by
scooter2
(A taxpayer voting for Barack Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.)
To: managusta; xcamel
3 posted on
10/20/2008 10:05:34 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
To: managusta; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
5 posted on
10/20/2008 10:10:22 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
To: managusta
Facts don't matter. It is ideology driving a desire to seize control politically and economically. The lefty policy changes will do far more damage than any imagined "anthropogenic CO2".
7 posted on
10/20/2008 10:13:54 AM PDT by
Myrddin
To: managusta
Your bandwagon is running out gas! Obama's going to give us a free windmills for our band wagon, so there! Nya!
(/sarcasm off)
Find later self ping.
8 posted on
10/20/2008 10:16:36 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(Should we turn Alaska or Texas into our Galt's Gulch?)
To: managusta; xcamel; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; ..
Thanks for the ping, Xcamel.
9 posted on
10/20/2008 10:18:40 AM PDT by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: managusta
Does not matter, government will implement “green” solutions at any cost for the next few years then take the credit.
11 posted on
10/20/2008 10:39:35 AM PDT by
edcoil
To: managusta
I think with the downturn in the economy, frankly we just can’t afford to have a global warming catastrophe, so we won’t.
12 posted on
10/20/2008 10:54:53 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
(I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that wants to gut our Second Amendment!)
To: managusta
The evidence we have is that our planet goes through hotter and colder periods lasting for decades and centuries, e.g. the medieval climate optimum, little ice age and, further back, the late Holocene climate optimum or hypsothermal. The conceptual problem some have despite the evidence involves the received notion that stars are thermonuclear engines. IF that were the case, there would be no reason to expect solar activity to increase or decrease periodically and thus cause planetary weather changes.
Stars are not thermonuclear engines; They are plasma-physics phenomena. They're basically similar to lightning rods i.e. focal points of cosmic discharge. As they pass through regions of space with greater or lesser electrical potential from themselves, they heat up or cool off.
To: managusta
Gore could be freezing to death and he'd still be yelling about “global warming”.
Could liberals as narrow minded and rigid as they seem?
17 posted on
10/20/2008 11:25:16 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Mail acorns to t;he MSM starting October 21. Reporters: ACORN addresses are in phone book.)
To: managusta
I notice a subtle shift of concern from Global Warming to Climate Change. This allows Al Gore to sound the alarm no matter what the weather does.
20 posted on
10/20/2008 11:57:16 AM PDT by
NorCalGuy
(Everybody complains about the weather but nobody does anything about it)
To: managusta
Another way to look at it is that if WW-II did not bring about the great man-made eco-holocaust, it can’t happen.
To: managusta
This is why they are in a panic to pass some sort of feel-good legislation on this. If they can claim credit for addressing the “problem” before it’s evidence there isn’t one, they can be the big heroes.
23 posted on
10/20/2008 12:01:57 PM PDT by
Scutter
To: Rurudyne; steelyourfaith
25 posted on
10/20/2008 12:21:41 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; BenLurkin; ...
26 posted on
10/20/2008 12:22:23 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
To: managusta
One of the major arguments of the doomists was that there were no reputable scientists who opposed their wacko theory. Now they seem to be arising from all around the world scoffing at the notion of man-made gw. The doomists have been fairly silent lately. Maybe they sense the scam is about over.
To: managusta
Let’s start calling it the ‘AlGore Minimum’.
32 posted on
10/20/2008 1:03:03 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: managusta
33 posted on
10/20/2008 1:39:17 PM PDT by
Kevmo
(I love that sound and please let that baby keep on crying. ~Sarah Palin)
To: managusta
Well here on the Texas gulf coast our climtate is exactly the same as it was when we moved here 35 years ago. The occasional hurricane and rare snowfall, same ole same ole.
37 posted on
10/20/2008 3:43:27 PM PDT by
buffyt
(Who is John Galt and I really think Atlas WILL SHRUG very soon.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson