Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle over same-sex marriage ending (Prop 8 Passes)
SF Gate ^ | 11/4/08 | John Wildermuth, Chronicle Staff Writer

Posted on 11/04/2008 10:08:40 PM PST by paltz

After a heated, divisive campaign, fueled by a record $73 million of spending, California voters Tuesday were backing Prop. 8, which would change the state Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Six months after the California Supreme Court cleared the way for gay and lesbian couples to legally wed, the estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who took advantage of the landmark decision now are wondering if they will be the last.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; election; gaymarriageban; homosexualagenda; prop8; samesexban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: paltz

WTF is wrong with California? Butt sex bad, commie president good.

One F’ed up state!


21 posted on 11/04/2008 10:13:30 PM PST by Caper29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

excellent! at least I can go to bed on some good news.


22 posted on 11/04/2008 10:13:34 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paltz
http://vote.sos.ca.gov/Returns/props/59.htm

27.9% ( 7097 of 25423 ) precincts
as of Nov. 4, 2008, at 10:09 p.m.

8   Y   Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry   1,973,226   52.4%

It could still fail.

23 posted on 11/04/2008 10:13:58 PM PST by CE2949BB (I voted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Not to be the wet blanket here, but only 25% of the precincts reporting and the amendment is only leading 53/47. CNN hasn’t called it for Yes at this point, and I’m concerned with the current support level.

IT HAS NOT PASSED YET. Returns here in CA can be very volatile as big blocks of city votes come rolling in.


24 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:11 PM PST by ER_in_OC,CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Don’t be insulting, B.O. is a Marxist.


25 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:19 PM PST by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Hope.


26 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:19 PM PST by murphE ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." - GK Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman

It’s a Constitutional Amendment, so I don’t know what the procedure is now to overturn it.

I honestly don’t know — I would just hope it would take a look more work than the last Proposition we passed.


27 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:28 PM PST by rom (Keep Senator Government from Spreading YOUR Wealth! McCain/Palin '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boagenes
One ray of sunshine...thank God.

Yes, thank God. But make that three rays - Arizona passed their marriage amendment by a landslide. And Florida's looks like it will pass easily - even with a 60% required vote.

28 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:42 PM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles – and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

It is schzoid isn’t it? My husband and I vote across the board conservative and I can not even grasp how one can vote Yes on 8 and Yes on Obama. It is absolutely disconnected.


29 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:47 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Latinos — they won both ways, free citizenship and socially conservative value.


30 posted on 11/04/2008 10:14:59 PM PST by indianyogi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman

It’s very difficult, close to impossible in fact, for a court to overturn a state constitutional amendment.

That being said, I’m sure they’ll try.


31 posted on 11/04/2008 10:15:18 PM PST by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

CELEBRATION TIME - Now the Gays will be going after the “conservative” Blacks for doing this - the party is just starting !!!


32 posted on 11/04/2008 10:15:29 PM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

Okay, I thought we had more precincts reporting.

This is actually BAD news. I’ve seen lots of propositions look promising at this time at night, and then go down as the big cities reported.

It needs a bigger buffer than this to be safe I’m afraid.


33 posted on 11/04/2008 10:15:48 PM PST by rom (Keep Senator Government from Spreading YOUR Wealth! McCain/Palin '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: paltz

The same court that sat aside the original marriage ban will likewise set this aside. As I understand it, California makes a distinction between a Constitutional Amendment, and a Constitutional Revision. The court will use that as its basis, saying the incorrect procedure was used and that only a Constitutional Convention could “take away” pre-exisitng rights. In other words it’s Lucy pulling away the football as Charlie Brown kicks.

I doubt they can sell the idea of a Constitutional Convention. Particularly not in the new political reality.


34 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:26 PM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

Poo. We’ll hold tight then.


35 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:29 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman
As a Californian who voted for this proposition I believe its a constitutional amendment and not subject to court review. Any Constitutional lawyers out there please provide a “free” opinion.
36 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:45 PM PST by RichardAubrey (Richard Aubrey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman
The liberal courts will just overturn it. Count on it.

That's what they're there for, to overturn the will of the people. Well, that's what they think they're for, at least.

37 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:56 PM PST by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paltz

(yawn)

The scumbag Democrats will challenge “Prop 8”in court and get a permanent “stay”.

In other words, this proposition will meet the same fate as every other proposition passed by California voters. And the people will simply bend over, grab their ankles, say “thank you”, and then go back to sleep....

Big deal.


38 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:56 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

“who are these so concerned citizens voting for this and yet voting a facist in?....”

Mexican immigrants. They don’t like homosexuality, but they are otherwise liberals and a minority who voted for a minority for Prez.


39 posted on 11/04/2008 10:16:59 PM PST by flaglady47 (It's crunch time, folks.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redstateconfidential

They are stupid! I have a friend from CA who said that people were voting *for* Prop 8 because they were *for* same-sex marriage!


40 posted on 11/04/2008 10:17:05 PM PST by Marie (Palin/Rush '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson