[Publius6961]

When computer "models data" challenge the validity of direct observations, even the densest moonbat kool-aid drinker must begin to have nagging doubts about the entire debate.

[Buckhead]

Well, maybe not so much. We are arguing facts on a matter of secular faith. Water off a duck’s back.

[Steely Tom]

When computer "models data" challenge the validity of direct observations, even the densest moonbat kool-aid drinker must begin to have nagging doubts about the entire debate.

One would think so.

Personally, I'm expecting laws criminalizing private ownership of outdoor thermometers, or dissemination of outdoor temperature data that does not agree with the predictions of "computer models."

Look for subtle changes in the wording of your local weather report. Instead of giving the current temperature, they will call it the "apparent temperature."