The Delicate Balance of Ear Crystals (Darwinist reductionism undermined by epigenetic development)

ICR ^ | December 9, 2008 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

[editor-surveyor]

"I would rather not see FreeRepublic turned into a Creationist forum"

Irrelevant. - The owner and creator of Freerepublic has said plainly that it is a creationist forum.

There are other places you can go that have the lower standards that you crave.

[editor-surveyor]

"The purge of the scientists and other rational thinkers a couple of years ago settled that issue."

No scientist, nor rational thinker was ever purged; just evolutionists, the enemies of rational thinking, and science.

[Coyoteman]

No scientist, nor rational thinker was ever purged; just evolutionists, the enemies of rational thinking, and science.

I bet you're a lot of fun at parties too, eh?

[editor-surveyor]

There were no fossils 6000 years ago; the fossils are the result of the Genesis judgement, about 4500 years ago.

[tpanther]

Evolution is not about first beginnings. It is about the origin of species by natural selection. If you want to argue that a creator created the first cells a few billion years ago, fine. I will not argue with that possibility.

It's too bad that not everyone thinks this way. Elitist liberals enforce their opinions of science on the masses, and in order to do so, they have to sue people into silence to control their godless NEA liberal public schools.It's the only way they're able to succeed.

[marktwain]

You are welcome to your faith. I support Christianity, I think it is a bedrock part of our culture. I do not believe that the physical evidence supports a “young” earth.

You can argue that a creator created the physical evidence for an old earth when he created the young earth, but that does not change the physical evidence.

[TheBigIf]

Actually I think that this information much more supports the theory made by Rupert Sheldrake in his book “A New Science of Life” (The Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance).

“The theory consists of an addition to the chemical and physical properties of materialism, something in addition to the DNA code in random mutations and non-random natural selection, an additional force what many vitialists have always acknowledged; the idea of higher organizational states. And here it is the theory of morphogenetic fields and formative causation. The idea of morphogenetic fields first developed by embryologists such as Conrad Waddington and later mathematically by theoreticians such as Rene Thomas. “

[GodGunsGuts]

So it’s ok for the Evos to post links supporting Darwin’s fanciful creation myth, but it’s not ok for Creationists and IDers to post post the OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary?!?! I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the Reagan coalition is comprised of Creationists and IDers. If our perspective is too much for you to bear, may I suggest there a better places for YOUR posts.

[GodGunsGuts]

I am more than willing to destroy whatever part of Darwin's fanciful creation myth you care to advance. Haven't you heard? Even the Evos are starting to abandon the HMS Beagle in search of a new evolutionary theory that isn't so flagrantly out of sync with the actual scientific data. LOL

[GodGunsGuts]

==I have seen the arguments “evolve” as each of the anti-evolution arguments were destroyed.

Talk, talk, talk.

[Alamo-Girl]

Interesting. Thanks for the ping!

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

The purge of the scientists and other rational thinkers a couple of years ago settled that issue.

But you were spared. It must be because you are neither a scientist nor a rational thinker.

[CottShop]

The Crystals in my ears must be acting as some wierd noise generators because I have tinnitus lol Tune in Tokyo-

Interesting article

[Filo]

Of course not. That must be left to scientists who have broken free from the Temple of Darwin’s materialist straightjacket.

Rare is the scientist who lives life in a straightjacket. They believe in evolution because it has been proven correct.

It is, instead, the evangelical who views life through blinders and who believes things for which there is no evidence.

[CottShop]

[[I have seen the arguments “evolve” as each of the anti-evolution arguments were destroyed]]

Oh really? Then you won’t mind stepping up to the plate, gettign beyond mere generalized opinions, and present those anti-ID destroying artiles then? Oh- and I’m NOT itnerested in ‘evidence’ that is NOTHING BUT OPINIONS and ASSUMPTIONS with NO scientific evidence to support- ‘Destroyed’? Lol- yep- sure it was.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Things that won't be shared with us:

—— the proof/clear explanation how the eye did so, and

—— whatever he's on

I'm not picky - either will make me happy

[CottShop]

[[Haven’t you heard? Even the Evos are starting to abandon the HMS Beagle in search of a new evolutionary theory that isn’t so flagrantly out of sync with the actual scientific data. LOL]]

Most of hte objective ‘thinking scientists’ are- but htose scientists who supposedly were ‘purged from FR’ dogmatically hold onto the dead hypothesis of Darwinism- hence hte reason they left en mass to start a site of hteir own that indulges in the petty tactics of attackign the messenger because they can’t attack the message (At least htey can’t do so with actual scientific evidence that isn’t rife with fantastical assumptions and biolgicaly impossible scenarios about past events for which they haven’t a clue about. Their motto “When hte goign gets tough- call the oponent a big poopie head and scream that ID scientists are psuedo-scientists” That’s some durn fine science right there Mr. Johnson!

[CottShop]

[[Rare is the scientist who lives life in a straightjacket. They believe in evolution because it has been proven correct.]]

Oh really? Then you won’t mind stepping up to the plate, gettign beyond mere generalized opinions, and present those anti-ID destroying artiles then? Oh- and I’m NOT itnerested in ‘evidence’ that is NOTHING BUT OPINIONS and ASSUMPTIONS with NO scientific evidence to support- ‘Proven Correct’? Lol- yep- sure it was.

[allmendream]

Cilia and hard crystals that sink to the “bottom” of a cell are also used in plant seeds to determine “up” and “down” so that the shoot emerges from the seed and goes up towards the sun rather than down further into the earth. This is hardly an uncommon or unknown mechanism, nor did the article explain how epigenetics are involved.

[GodGunsGuts]

I hate to break it to you, but materialist evolution is 100% impossible.