Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study finds troubling pattern of Southern California quakes
Los Angeles Times ^ | January 24, 2009 | Jia-Rui Chong

Posted on 01/24/2009 3:53:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

The southern stretch of the San Andreas fault has had a major temblor about every 137 years, according to new research. The latest looks to be overdue.

Large earthquakes have rumbled along a southern section of the San Andreas fault more frequently than previously believed, suggesting that Southern California could be overdue for a strong temblor on the notorious fault line, a new study has found.

The Carrizo Plain section of the San Andreas has not seen a massive quake since the much-researched Fort Tejon temblor of 1857, which at an estimated magnitude of 7.9 is considered the most powerful earthquake to hit Southern California in modern times.

But the new research by UC Irvine scientists, to be published next week, found that major quakes occurred there roughly every 137 years over the last 700 years. Until now, scientists believed big quakes occurred along the fault roughly every 200 years.

The findings are significant because seismologists have long believed this portion of the fault is capable of sparking the so-called Big One that officials have for decades warned will eventually occur in Southern California.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; earthquake

1 posted on 01/24/2009 3:53:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl; Brad's Gramma; A CA Guy; bd476; lainie; pollywog; Yaelle; ErnBatavia; NormsRevenge

fyi


2 posted on 01/24/2009 3:57:22 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

3 posted on 01/24/2009 3:57:22 PM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie utulie. Mornie alantie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You’ll feel it first!

`


4 posted on 01/24/2009 3:59:36 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Gosh with Yellowstone doing it’s thing and now with this things could get pretty complicated out west. I hope not because I’d hate to see what FEMA’s response would be under Obama!


5 posted on 01/24/2009 4:00:41 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Also today from http://www.knx1070.com/3-4-Quake-Off-SoCal-Coast-is-Widely-Felt—Sparks-L/3717734

Quake Was Centered Off Coast of Marina del Rey

MARINA DEL REY (AP) — A small earthquake rattled much of the Los Angeles area Friday night, sparking a lot of calls to authorities and to KNX Newsradio but causing no injuries or serious damage.

The U.S. Geological Survey said the 3.4-magnitude quake that hit at 7:42 p.m. was centered about one mile west-northwest of Marina Del Rey, abd aboiut four-and-a-half miles beneath the Earth’s surface.

It was felt by many people along the coast, and as far inland as the San Fernando Valley.

USGS seismologist Susan Hough said the quake was small, but ``if you’re sitting on sand or very loose soils by the coast, you’ll feel it more because the motion is amplified.’’

Hough said scientists will investigate the relationship between Friday night’s quake and Thursday afternoon’s 3.1-magnitude temblor in the San Fernando Valley, as they work to understand how earthquakes can trigger other shakes.

In the meantime, Hough said, the tiny quakes are a good reminder that Southern Californians should be prepared for major seismic activity.

``We don’t want to say the sky is falling, but there’s always a chance the sky could fall,’’ Hough said.


6 posted on 01/24/2009 4:08:53 PM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie utulie. Mornie alantie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Any one in LA feel this one last night?

Small earthquake rattles western Los Angeles

*******************EXCERPT*************************

Associated Press
9:54 PM PST, January 23, 2009

A small earthquake centered in Venice Beach rattled western Los Angeles on Friday night but caused no damage.

The U.S. Geological Survey said the 3.4-magnitude quake hit at 7:42 p.m. near the Venice boardwalk, a popular recreation spot for tourists and residents. People from Inglewood to the Pacific Palisades reported feeling a tremor.

*************************snip**************************

....and there was a Thursday afternoon's 3.1-magnitude temblor in the San Fernando Valley

7 posted on 01/24/2009 4:09:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

See #7...also one in SanFernando Valley on Thursday.


8 posted on 01/24/2009 4:11:50 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Alia; A message; AVNevis; Awestruck; bboop; Bennett46; bert; Beth; Betis70; ...

Go Ahead: Click It!

Click the card and help keep the lights on at Free Republic.


Thanks for the Ping, Ernest!

Earthquake Ping List. If you would like to have your name added to this list or removed from it, please FReepmail me.

Meanwhile the First Quarter 2009 Freepathon is now in its 25th day yet donations are stuck at 35%. Please donate what you can today to help keep Free Republic's lights on.

Now more than ever we need to keep Free Republic open.

Click here to donate

Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Also please stop by the current Freepathon thread and say hello, bump, or BTTT.




9 posted on 01/24/2009 4:32:31 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What is clear from the data presented in the report is that the frequency of earthquakes being reported for the area in the study is a statistical average, as in a rate of “an average of every 137 years”.

The report is not presenting data reflecting a periodic cycle in the prior history of “once every 137 years” or so.

A history reflecting a prior periodic cycle of roughly close to every 137 years, or so, would make the concern larger (more immediate) than it is, as a simple average rate of years between quakes of varying number of years apart;

particularly given the fact that the data available is for such a small part of the actual past time during which quakes in that area must have been occurring (like, how many eons has the Pacific Plate been hitting the North American Plate?).

Earthquakes happen, or they don’t. The LA Times needed some filler on a page.


10 posted on 01/24/2009 4:35:55 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Come’on Hollyweird!!! Wait for it,....wait for it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hit it baby, Daddy needs a new pair of shoes!!


11 posted on 01/24/2009 4:49:40 PM PST by Doc Savage ("Are you saying Jesus can't hit a curve ball? - Harris to Cerrano - Major League)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Does California have a “Department of the Big One”?


12 posted on 01/24/2009 4:53:34 PM PST by Nachoman (Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

ROFL!

LA Times likely owns it....they splash this kind of disaster soon info on the front page periodically,...helps sell papers ...now at 75 cents a copy!


13 posted on 01/24/2009 5:01:04 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Back in the late 80s early 90s there was the swarm of fairly good sized quakes. Whittier Narrows, Yucaipa, Northridge. Around that time the emergency preparedness people were predicting that a new round of frequent quakes was certain to occur just ahead. That warning was in vogue around 1992.

Suddenly, the activity dropped off a cliff. For at least a decade, there were hardly any quakes.

The truth is folks, these folks know no more about quake frequencies and near term predictions that you and I do.

Don’t let any of this get to you. It essentially means nothing at all.


14 posted on 01/24/2009 5:40:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (D1: Home of the golden tag line: 01/22/09 Obama hands the hope of the unborn to terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

15 posted on 01/24/2009 7:48:39 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You can see that there is almost no activity on the San Andreas between Parkfield and San Bernardino with Ft Tejon right in the middle. It may well un zip all along that total length.


16 posted on 01/24/2009 8:59:35 PM PST by Mike Darancette (0 parties while the economy burns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson