Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nitzy
I think the more ridiculous part is that the authors of the article give away the article to the medical journals while receiving no payment.

In academia, research does not count towards professional reputation unless it is published in a "peer reviewed" journal. The Internet is undermining the business model of the "peer reviewed" journals. They can copyright their edited and formatted copy of the scientist's research report, but the original report is the property of the United States which financed the research.

8 posted on 02/14/2009 7:36:45 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

I understand that. I meant it is even more ridiculous that the journals have done nothing to earn the right to claim ownership of the research. They did not even pay the researcher for the right to print it. They have no leg to stand on in their claim other than, “That’s the way it has always been done.”


10 posted on 02/14/2009 9:24:24 AM PST by nitzy (Take your pick: Globalism OR Limited Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson