[MHGinTN]

Lot of assumptions in your premise. First, no authority in HI has claimed to have seen the Net posted CoLB Barry has used to claim eligibility. Second, the HI authorities have not stated anything with regard to content in the long form they say is in their vaults. Third, if HI issued a CoLB within the past three years, Barry may have had the forgers use that to fabricate the thing on the Net and the HI authoritieis cannot make a statement confriming or denying authenticity without see what was used to make the Net versions.

A retired FBI documents expert has stated in deposition in the Keyes case that the thing on the Net is not acceptable as proof of anything near where Barry was born since by the disclaimer on the bottom, alteration made to the document voided it.

[DaGman]

Where this is so messed up is the notion that a lack of evidence is evidence and that’s what this whole non-issue is about. That’s what your reply says. The document has been examined by factcheck.org which IS a very reliable source of good information in spite of the fact that they have been trashed over this issue when their information was good for both sides of the fence prior to this issue.

There are no assumptions in my post. This issue has lost in each and every court it has been heard in. This case is a loser and a waste of time and taxpayer money. It’s time to move forward and start rebuilding this party with everyone headed in the same direction and not distracted by issues like this.