[DaGman]

Robertson may well be a sleeze bag. I’ll take your word and alamo-girl’s word for it as the bonified truth. However, that does not make this case have merit when it does not.

[an amused spectator]

However, that does not make this case have merit when it does not.

Perhaps.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that the post is about a sleazy Democrat thug shooting his mouth off about honest taxpaying citizens who brought a legal concern before his thug court.

Oh, and BTW - the sleazy Democrat thug's handlers DON'T pay taxes - that's for the dim-witted peasants who come to the corrupt court to get spat on, backhanded and legally assaulted...

[nufsed]

The “defendant” is in control of the evidence and refuses to produce it.

[Polarik]

Robertson may well be a sleeze bag. I’ll take your word and alamo-girl’s word for it as the bonified truth. However, that does not make this case have merit when it does not.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2200218/posts?page=148#148