Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge assails cases doubting Obama's citizenship
The Associated Press ^ | 3/5/2009 | NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 03/05/2009 4:03:57 PM PST by AJ in NYC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-189 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
Oh no you don't.

The link you provided that stated by your own words was "your opinion" completely contradicts the argument you are now making.

And now you're attempting to change the direction of your argument.

81 posted on 03/05/2009 5:49:39 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Being-And-Time

82 posted on 03/05/2009 5:49:55 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
They use it to define the meanings of words during the time period that laws were written.

Of course they do.

83 posted on 03/05/2009 5:50:31 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
The link you provided that stated by your own words was "your opinion" completely contradicts the argument you are now making.

OK, go back to reply 56, read the title of the link and then click on it. Then look at my reply 57. Now do you get it?

84 posted on 03/05/2009 5:52:28 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The Founders wrote themselves a "grandfather clause" so that they would be eligible to run for President since their parents were foreign born.

Read the above sentence again. One or more of their parents were foreign born which made them ineligible to run for President even though THEY were born on American soil. Their parents birthplace made them ineligible without tis clause :No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution,

85 posted on 03/05/2009 5:52:44 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You said in 77 they didn’t. Interesting.


86 posted on 03/05/2009 5:53:48 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Read the above sentence again. One or more of their parents were foreign born which made them ineligible to run for President even though THEY were born on American soil. Their parents birthplace made them ineligible without tis clause :No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution,

Yes, I know. Now where is the definition of natural born citizen?

87 posted on 03/05/2009 5:55:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: freedom9
A man doesn’t spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees to to keep a 10 dollar legitimate document from the public.

I've heard both here and on DU that "No one has proved that he's spent a dime on this". I keep pointing out, over and over, at every available opportunity, that these lawsuits aren't just dismissed because the judge looked at them and realized they were without merit. THEY WERE DEFENDED AGAINST BY REAL ATTORNEYS WHO DO NOT WORK FOR FREE.

In the case of the article above, Zero's attorney was even mentioned by name, and it was suggested that the fees may have to be reimbursed by the plaintiff. If there is no issue with the COLB, WHY does he keep defending himself against the suits????

I'm no conspiracy nut, by any means, but NO ONE has answered this question, and the media sure isn't interested. In a country with a real media, I wouldn't have to ask this question into the ether over and over and over again. I'd already know.

88 posted on 03/05/2009 5:55:18 PM PST by Hardastarboard (The Fairness Doctrine isn't about "Fairness" - it's about Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Yeah, I get it. You don't know what the **** you're talking about let alone posting.

Get it?

89 posted on 03/05/2009 5:57:00 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Yeah, I get it. You don't know what the **** you're talking about let alone posting.

Golly gee whiz, now you're all pissed off at me. What ever shall I do now?

90 posted on 03/05/2009 5:58:17 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Golly gee whiz, now you're all pissed off at me. What ever shall I do now?

I'm not pissed off, I just said you don't know what the **** you're talking or posting about.

Gotta guilty conscience?

91 posted on 03/05/2009 6:01:49 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I know you know what it says. Words have meaning and you know what those words mean written the way that they are. It means Obama is ineligible.

Have a good evening.

92 posted on 03/05/2009 6:04:57 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLaertius
James Robertson was appointed a United States District Judge by President Bill Clinton in 1994.

I knew he was a Bill Klingtong apointee as soon as I read what he said. Thanx for confirming it.

93 posted on 03/05/2009 6:05:31 PM PST by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; Non-Sequitur

He knows that the Founders wrote themselves a clause so that they could run for President. Their meaning is clear. It’s also clear that Obama isn’t eligible.


94 posted on 03/05/2009 6:09:05 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
THEY WERE DEFENDED AGAINST BY REAL ATTORNEYS WHO DO NOT WORK FOR FREE.

Today, children, we're going to learn a new concept. It's called "pro-bono." Can you say pro-bono?

95 posted on 03/05/2009 6:09:28 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
He knows that the Founders wrote themselves a clause so that they could run for President. Their meaning is clear. It’s also clear that Obama isn’t eligible.

Now if only they had put in a definition.

96 posted on 03/05/2009 6:10:41 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
If there is no issue with the COLB, WHY does he keep defending himself against the suits????

Because he has to. When someone sues you, you generally have to respond. Even if the lawsuit is frivolous, as in this case.

97 posted on 03/05/2009 6:10:46 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Las Vegas Ron

They made their meaning clear. You just don’t want to accept it.


98 posted on 03/05/2009 6:12:24 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
The Founders wrote themselves a "grandfather clause" so that they would be eligible to run for President since their parents were foreign born.

My goodness, someone is dense.

They wrote themselves a grandfather clause because they themselves were not born in the United States. They couldn't have been because the United States did not exist at the time of their birth.

Duh.

99 posted on 03/05/2009 6:13:25 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
They made their meaning clear.

Where did they do this?

100 posted on 03/05/2009 6:14:04 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson