Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Nuclear proliferation is good. What's the return address when a US city goes poof and no one claims responsibility?
1 posted on 04/04/2009 8:38:28 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: neverdem
Before 2003, neocon hawks and French lefties agreed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

I guess that makes Bill Clinton and John Kerry French lefties, then.

2 posted on 04/04/2009 8:40:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Dyson disagrees. Dyson doesn't dispute that human activity is causing warming. But he challenges the consensus that warming will be catastrophic.

He's half way there, anyway. It's a start.

3 posted on 04/04/2009 8:42:52 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Climate change will be catastrophic. We all know civilization is doomed if we don’t reduce carbon emissions, right? “

That statement is bunk and easily shown to be so...

We increase Co2 by 35% in 50 years and the global temperatures changed by 0.4C. In 50 years.

It’s all hyped up based on models that are not panning out as reality.


4 posted on 04/04/2009 8:43:16 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

So you say the Cubs will never again win the World Series?

Before the 21st. Century has ended, they will have.


5 posted on 04/04/2009 8:44:48 PM PDT by re_tail20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The “global warmers” are tap dancing their asses off trying to hold their scam together. “Global cooling” became “global warming”. Now, “global warming” has had to morph into “climate change.” These jackasses are talking about THE WEATHER! And like a bunch of neanderthals, the weather has got them scared to death. Time for them to build something like Stonehenge for their Gaia and weather god ceremonies and leave the rest of us alone.


6 posted on 04/04/2009 8:46:57 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We're All Garbage Dump Bears Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Newsweek: What else are we wrong about?

Start here:


7 posted on 04/04/2009 8:47:30 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Maybe that Obama is “the One”?!!!LOL!!


8 posted on 04/04/2009 8:49:03 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The physicist Freeman Dyson disagrees. Dyson doesn't dispute that human activity is causing warming. But he challenges the consensus that warming will be catastrophic.

I am 100% certain the link between CO2 and warming is complete BS.

9 posted on 04/04/2009 8:49:15 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Newsweak has worked to destroy this country. Never forget. Go to your local bookstore and shake out all the subscription litter cards and drop them in the mail for proce$$ing.


11 posted on 04/04/2009 8:58:53 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Dear Jacob Weisberg, you are wrong about everything, including this question, which is full of arrogant propaganda even as you claim to be looking into your errors in fact and analysis.

First be humble, until then no one can correct you and you can certainly not correct yourself. How arrogant you are!


14 posted on 04/04/2009 9:05:26 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steelyourfaith; xcamel; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

GW Ping


22 posted on 04/04/2009 10:19:55 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Posessing nuclear induces restraint only in those countries where there is sufficient moral 'consciosness' so as to exercise such resraint.

All to say; you do not let babies handle guns; or allow children to play with real ones. Nor may they handle knives or other dangerous objects which may harm them or others. It is the responsibility of the 'adult consciousness' to protect them from themselves; and protect ourselves and others, from them and - what well could be - their inmature; unrestrained responses.

Allowing what we know and call, 'rogue' nations get into the 'adult sandbox' is an abdication of our responsibility to whomever may be harmed by their lack of control - a behavior we know, they might easily and 'irrationally' exhibit.

We are NOT making the world a safer place; but rather allowing a most threatening environment to prosper and threaten life, as we know it. While Libs typically will congratulate themselves here; they are so wrong to do so. This IS in truth, a damning abdication of our moral responsibility to the world-at-large; and to all at home in ours.

26 posted on 04/05/2009 12:30:28 AM PDT by cricket (NOOOOOOO to Serfdom. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
And if it really turns out that there is a serious problem, genetically engineered carbon-eating trees might fix it. (Might.)

Newsweek emphasizes "Might." If they read GW articles, that is the next most common word after "the." I exaggerate, but they usually toss in in.

30 posted on 04/05/2009 2:21:42 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne; steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; xcamel; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; ...
Thanks neverdem.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
 

32 posted on 04/05/2009 3:12:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

No Wonder Climate Alarmists Refuse to Debate
American Thinker | April 05, 2009 | Marc Sheppard
Posted on 04/05/2009 12:19:51 AM PDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2222642/posts

[snip] Climate Progress’s Joe Romm... “On our current emissions path we are going to warm the United States 10-15 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century and sea level rise will be 5 feet or higher and a third of the planet will be desert.”


33 posted on 04/05/2009 3:15:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"What's the return address when a US city goes poof and no one claims responsibility?"

I've a friend who says it would be France. (Just to be sure.)

37 posted on 04/05/2009 4:08:12 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (will work for bailout bonus.... Twitter: maddawggmorgan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Global warming is clearly a hoax, but what about cholesterol? The medical community has billions invested in cholesterol-lowering statin drugs that may be counterproductive. Any ideas?

Evolution is also a hoax though there can be change over time, not from one specie to another.

And of course “caring politicians” are a hoax.

When one thinka bout it, hoaxes are everywhere because there are gullible people.


39 posted on 04/05/2009 4:31:51 AM PDT by Theodore R. (GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“genetically engineered carbon-eating trees might fix it.”

Did I really read that????


41 posted on 04/05/2009 5:46:43 AM PDT by Peet (<- A.K.A. the Foundling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Currently reading 'Liberty and Tyranny' by Mark Levin.
 
Page 129    Levin cites:  A 1975 article in Newsweek "The Cooling World"   concluded "The central fact is that after three decades of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth's climate seems to be cooling down." 
 
Page 130    Levin cites:   In 2008 the same Newsweek that gave weight to the science of global cooling published an article titled "Global Warming is a Cause of This Year's Extreme Weather."
 
He sort of tears them a new one all over the issue.

44 posted on 04/05/2009 7:51:12 AM PDT by Radix (Two down, 46 to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Can we take Al Bore’s Nobel prize back?


49 posted on 04/05/2009 11:01:50 AM PDT by Justice (Never trust a Russian. They are cheats and Liars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson