Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery
[QUOTE]finally the fact that the contribution of carbon dioxide to greenhouse warming asymptotically approaches zero as its level increases[/QUOTE]

Please explain this, it's not making sense to me. By the contribution are you talking about the temp change?, or the change in the derivative deltaT/concentration with an increase in concentration?

If you'd quote a source that would be great...considering that this can almost be treated as a colligative property in the atmosphere and i have trouble believing that the derivative would approach zero at such a low concentration. Especially because there are huge differences in the absorption between 70% concentration by moles and 80% concentration by moles in CO2....which is way beyond anything in the atmosphere by a factor of millions.

18 posted on 04/15/2009 2:07:32 AM PDT by ciwwaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ciwwaf
Here's one quick quote and source:

Our modeling results show that nonlinear patterns were parabolic, asymptotic, and threshold-like in response to temperature, CO2, and precipitation anomalies, respectively, for NPP, NEE, and R(h).

1: Ecol Appl. 2008 Mar;18(2):453-66.Links Modeling patterns of nonlinearity in ecosystem responses to temperature, CO2, and precipitation changes. Zhou X, Weng E, Luo Y. Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA. zxuhui14@ou.edu

That took maybe 45 seconds on google.

24 posted on 04/15/2009 2:46:54 AM PDT by Darwin Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ciwwaf
Reference: The Skeptics' Handbook (author is Joanne Nova)
43 posted on 04/15/2009 9:47:19 AM PDT by sourcery (Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson