[centurion316]

Based upon my estimate from holding the specimen in my hand, it was more like 3000 years old

Well, there you have it: irrefutable scientific evidence. And did you find it in situ? And, if so, were the surrounding sediments also 3000 years old? How was this determined? Oh, never mind. Your estimate ought to be more than enough to settle the case.

[blackpacific]

Sometimes seeing something first hand is more informative than years of academic indoctrination. I made no claim of having irrefutable evidence. But I would not be surprised if the granite in the pebble bed it was found in had little polonium halos burnt into them. You know, those pesky little radioactive burns that happened in less than .0001 seconds, with no antecedents, in rock that supposedly took eons to form. Oh, scratch the eons. What is interesting to see in the limestone quarries around Fairborn is the abundance of sea creatures which died instantly, completely intact. Dead clams open up, eaten clams are shattered, and on any beach the dead shells are ground to fine sand by the pounding surf. So many live sea creatures were piled on each other in the middle of the continent that the refuse formed limestone several meters thick. Unspeakable violence marks their graves, for anyone with eyes to see.

[org.whodat]

LOL

[blackpacific]

Well, there you have it: irrefutable scientific evidence. And did you find it in situ? And, if so, were the surrounding sediments also 3000 years old? How was this determined? Oh, never mind. Your estimate ought to be more than enough to settle the case.

Who is saying the argument is settled, by irrefutable evidence, case closed? I think that type of reasoning is owned by the Darwinians. If you can’t win any arguments, then try bullying, it works most of the time.