Replies

“Peer review” is nothing more than total oligarchical tyranny.

What we get is a bunch of closed-minded half-educated sycophants to secularism proudly wearing their “PhD” from godless liberal institutions refusing to hear any new idea that could advance science out of the dead-standstill rut it has fallen into over the last several decades.

-Dare suggest that basic physical principles like thermodynamics prohibit the forward evolution of new structures and functions in life? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that evidence of mass extinction and rapid sedimentation are evidence for a global flood? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that calibration of radiometric dating by fossils and physical constants that are shown to change with time renders the method unreliable, and that the data better support a young earth? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that the astronomical redshift is better suited to an anthropocentric unvierse based on hydrogenic white-earth cosmology than a “Big Bang” that violates gravitational and energy conservation laws? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that vaccines are poisoning our children with toxins, that natural remedies can provide better cures for cancer than invasive surgery, or that supposed “unstoppable plagues” may indeed just be harmless retroviruses? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that nature isn’t truly random and that quantum fuzziness models that contradict common sense can be improved upon by using modified models of the atom and relying on classical mechanics and electromagnetism? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that earth-centered coordinate systems are better suited for many astronomical calculations, or that non-coordinate-specific general relativity provides insights into the possible nature of a universal “center”? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that electromagnetism, which is billions of times stronger than gravity, as observed many times on earth, is the true unifying binding force of the universe? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that the immense data processing required to support the myth of global warming might actually be a sham? Blackballed for life.

-Dare suggest that homosexuality is a personal choice rather than a hereditary condition (which contradicts the Darwinian principle they are so endeared to)? Blackballed for life.

Peer review has become nothing more than a tool for the self-appointed elite to prop up their own pet theories while rejecting new insights that might make them compete for their livelihoods, or even more commonly, just might be too deep for their puny minds to comprehend.

All modern “peer review” in science has done is deprive the scientific community of a unity with the Creator, and the trickle-down effect has pushed a once great nation away from the Almighty.

We have some great conservative minds here on FreeRepublic - through a rich spectrum of online activism, hopefully we can supplement the peer review process with good old common sense criticism to tear holes through the flimsy charade that modern science has become, and restore unity between science and its true source, the Creator.