Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Generally speaking, the standard for peer review in the medical journals is only a weak shadow of that for the physical sciences.


5 posted on 05/03/2009 7:43:25 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jdege
Generally speaking, the standard for peer review in the medical journals is only a weak shadow of that for the physical sciences.

I am also very curious as to how the Nobel Peace Prize committee actually peer reviewed Al Gore's powerpoints before giving him the Nobel Prize.

Did they actually consult scientists ( including those who disagree ) to determine if his alarmism has any factual basis ?
8 posted on 05/03/2009 7:56:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: jdege

“Generally speaking, the standard for peer review in the medical journals is only a weak shadow of that for the physical sciences.”

If the paper comes from certain institutions or researchers it is accepted, how dare we disagree with one of the annointed. Check out where the NIH fraud comes from. The more liberal the institution the more likely the fraud in my opinion.


10 posted on 05/03/2009 8:28:13 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Support the 10th. Ammendment and become a Neo-terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson