To: GodGunsGuts
I’m not quite sure how mammoths could be wiped out in the Flood and then subsequently be around for a post-Flood ice age.
4 posted on
05/05/2009 9:30:06 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
Im not quite sure how mammoths could be wiped out in the Flood and then subsequently be around for a post-Flood ice age. I'm not sure where these "scientists" get off saying the mammoths are up to 40,000 years old when we all know the world is only about 6,000 years old. Duh!
(/sarc)
5 posted on
05/05/2009 9:33:59 AM PDT by
gdani
(I've got a new road under my wheels)
To: dirtboy
See my reply in #3. My mistake.
To: dirtboy
smart guy, that Noah. He didn't grab the biggest animals he could find.
To: dirtboy
You should also find a lot of Mammoth evidence between Mount Ararat and Siberia if the two that where on the ark, had babies and migrated all the way up there.
8 posted on
05/05/2009 9:37:19 AM PDT by
mnehring
To: dirtboy
Im not quite sure how mammoths could be wiped out in the Flood and then subsequently be around for a post-Flood ice age.And, you would think that an Ice Age, mile thick sheets of ice, snow for 10,000 years, would have been at least mentioned, in passing, somewhere after the Tower of Babel, perhaps, squeezed in before Moses...
19 posted on
05/05/2009 10:17:41 AM PDT by
jonascord
(Hey, we have the Constitution. What's to worry about?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson