Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan

“It is not the Army’s responsibility to refute partial reports..” Hell it isn’t. What do you think their people who work with the media do when there is wrong info? Sit there with their thumbs in their ears? No, they get the record corrected. Moreso, they talk with the reporters ahead of time to make sure they have their facts correct. DUH? What a novel idea! Your lack of understanding of how reporters and the military work wiith each other is mind-boggling.

“...by leftist anti-military sources.”

So CNN, NYT, Military Times, JAMA, San Jose Mercury and the Hartford Courant are leftist anti-military sources? Baised? Sure. Everyone is. “Leftist anti-military sources?” Wow. You’d better leave now. Joseph Farahis is calling you to write some articles.


126 posted on 05/13/2009 9:22:01 AM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: PurpleMan
Let's get to the point.

Why are you making such a point to besmirch our military on a conservative website?

What motivates you to ignore the overall statistics on suicide and state your anti-military perspective? (No one is arguing with the numbers - just what you have implied by using them).

I don't know who you are other than what you have said here. Do you oppose the Iraq War, and therefore join the left in presenting an anti-military view? Do you oppose the military itself? Are you a pacifist?

What point, exactly, are you trying to make with your less than persuasive argument and speculation here?

127 posted on 05/13/2009 9:33:46 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson