Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
That's right, a black market pops up to make sure kids can now not only get access to alcohol as they have in the past, but now they can have access to all the other drugs too for a price.

Once any government decides on prohibition, then they make a market black, i.e. with people willing to kill or go to jail because it is so profitable. Where's that black market profitability with underage alcohol drinking?

88 posted on 05/22/2009 9:11:24 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne; bamahead; All
That's right, a black market pops up to make sure kids can now not only get access to alcohol as they have in the past, but now they can have access to all the other drugs too for a price.

Once any government decides on prohibition, then they make a market black, i.e. with people willing to kill or go to jail because it is so profitable. Where's that black market profitability with underage alcohol drinking?

Let me elaborate. Just what's a kid? What's the age of majority that you have all the rights of an adult? This is tricky. Modern studies of brain imaging indicate that "Teen Brain Still Developing and Maturing to Mid 20s."

It's tricky because it's fairly arbitrary. What age do you pick for determining the cut-off ages for be able to legally marry, smoke or use tobacco, drink alcohol, vote, or becoming an infantryman? There's a reason for the root of the word infantry. It gets me when I hear stories about child soldiers that are obviously at least old teenagers.

What about statutory rape, or being tried as an adult? Those are just some of the problems with the "It's for the children," argument i.e. when should they be considered adults. I have trouble denying eighteen year old infantrymen any rights. I wish they couldn't vote until they were at least twenty five, but that's another story.

If it is found in nature, I would let them sell it like alcohol and tobacco, possibly with the exception of hallucinogens. If it is chemically processed and refined, then it would come under the juridiction of the DEA, FDA or both. Making opium and coca leaves illegal created the incentive to concentrate the active ingredients into heroin and cocaine.

That also created the incentive to inject drugss intravenously with all the attendant spread of viral and bacterial disease. The latter makes me believe in needle exchange programs, not just for the immediate costs to society of the intravenous drug abuser, but to the innocent victims that they infect with various forms of hepatitis, HIV/AIDS, etc. It's quite a list.

Taxing it like alcohol and tobacco will only become problematic when the taxes are so great that the government creates the temptation to just steal it and sell it relatively cheaply.

Only the left believes you can change human nature. Those who believe harsh penalties deter it can look at how chock full the prisons are. The war on some drugs is just a war on human nature, IMHO.

92 posted on 05/22/2009 12:33:48 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson