If their alarmist warnings are indeed accurate, it still begs the question of whether we are wise enough to figure out what the appropriate drastic changes are and determined enough to implement them. I will also note that there is remarkably little argument on the warmist side as to what the appropriate changes might be.
It is also very odd that the necessary drastic changes always correlate so perfectly with what liberals would prefer if there were no crisis. How unbelievable is that!
As I posted on the “global cooling” thread.
The solution, obviously, will be
GLOBAL SOCIALISM AND REDUCED WESTERN LIFESTYLE...
as it is with any “crisis”.