Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tricky_k_1972

It seems to me that modelling the sun’s activity should be much simpler than modelling the earth’s atmosphere, as there are many fewer variables. And yet we can’t model the sun properly either....

Makes me real optimistic about climate change modelling....

hh


9 posted on 05/29/2009 2:18:18 PM PDT by hoosier hick ((I'm back to..) Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo. (Barry Goldwater))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosier hick

Climate change modelling just makes the modelers assertions look more scientific. But I’d disagree with the assertion that there are many fewer variables. I’d say that we know less about what variables there are.


14 posted on 05/29/2009 2:52:55 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: hoosier hick
It seems to me that modelling the suns activity should be much simpler than modelling the earths atmosphere, as there are many fewer variables. And yet we cant model the sun properly either....

The sun is actually a very dynamic and complicated thing. It is not some simple blob of nuclear fire in the sky that never changes in unpredictable ways. And we can observe may things on the earth first-hand. No one can go to the sun and observe the "weather." After this new solar cycle has run its course, a lot of textbooks on astrophysics will be revised. Scientists will know more about how stars work. This knowledge could save lives. If we knew we were headed for another mini ice age event, we might be able to do some things to prepare for it although we could not come close to completely preparing for it.

15 posted on 05/29/2009 3:25:10 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson