[thedilg]

chart the drew in crayon, with zero actual data (including any indication of a beginning of the next cycle):
*********************************************************
Thanks for providing the Chart. As you so correctly observerd there is no data that supports the start of cycle 24, its shape, its peak, its nothing. Of course that is par for the global warmists.

[Star Traveler]

You said — Thanks for providing the Chart. As you so correctly observerd there is no data that supports the start of cycle 24, its shape, its peak, its nothing. Of course that is par for the global warmists.

—

Yeah, and what’s to make them think that we won’t get into a Maunder Minimum type of situation which will produce a “Little Ice Age” again, like we had several hundred years ago?

They seem to think we can’t go into a Maunder Minimum type of situation again... and that’s *key* to understanding the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) debate going on today.