To: LeGrande
Other than it being a pile of pabulum and strawmen, I guess not.
It’s actually quite nice to see the creationist author concede all the main points of the argument, and then deny the conclusion.
7 posted on
07/25/2009 10:54:24 AM PDT by
mike-zed
To: mike-zed
Can you share with us what part is the “pabulum and strawmen”?
8 posted on
07/25/2009 11:00:43 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: mike-zed; GodGunsGuts
It’s actually quite nice to see the creationist author concede all the main points of the argument, and then deny the conclusion. Yes, he tacitly agreed with the central origin of life, evolution from that origin, ages of evolution, age of the earth, etc, etc. His only seeming disagreement with TOE goes back billions of years. GGG must not of read the PDF, because GGG thinks the world was created in 5000 bc.
The word I think you were thinking of was pablum.
11 posted on
07/25/2009 11:13:54 AM PDT by
LeGrande
(I once heard a smart man say that you canÂ’t reason someone out of something that they didnÂ’t reaso)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson