Replies

Not at all LowJoe, actually your eagerness to put the topic on the shelf suggests that you don't like talking about it.
Hmm, maybe you're not as stupid as you seem because you actually understood that I didn't want to talk about it any longer. Or did you think that restating the obvious was somehow clever on your part?

I would never attempt to be clever and exceed your cranial limitations of comprehension. I don't torture small animals, midgets or the intellectually challenged and I'm sure you fit into one or more of those categories.

Don't confuse infatuation with admiration Joe, homosexuals do that all the time.
And you, of course, speak definitively from experience, Jessup.

Ahh, an almost creative variation on the old lame 'I know you are but what am I' semi-snappy retort. Don't burn up any more neurons with those gambits, you haven't that many to spare.

And don't assume I know nothing about economic liberty.
Okay. But I can guess that you're no big fan of it either.

Your continued existence and the word 'guess' are unquestionably lifetime companions.

and don't get excited with those letters 'A,S,S' in 'assume', ok?
I'm not excited in the least -- it's nothing like your desire to keep the homosexual topic from going on the shelf.

It's all about family and social values Joey, you prattle on about 'economic liberty' to the exclusion of all else, which tells everyone all they need to know about you, which is: in your world, it's all about MONEY. To hell with family issues, to hell with the latter-day sodomites wreaking havoc on Judeo-Christian values, as long as you get the maximum filthy lucre into your pocket, you're a happy camper, that's what rocks your world isn't it?

That could be viewed as somewhat queer, Jessup.

It would only be viewed as queer by someone who is worried about their own sexuality. And you don't look like a steer Joe, not even one from Texas.

And stop embarrasing yourself with the feeble attempts at humor; you're out of your element.

There is the proof Joe, you subconsciously typed the word 'embarrassing' minus an 's' because you didn't want to type the word 'A.S.S.'

Better tell the Missus that you're getting a little claustrophobic in that closet and you need to come out.

Thanks for playing Joe, now get back to counting all that cash of yours, that's all that matters anyway, right?

Ya money-grubbing oaf.

It's all about family and social values Joey, you prattle on about 'economic liberty' to the exclusion of all else, which tells everyone all they need to know about you, which is: in your world, it's all about MONEY.

This is actually important and the only reason why I'm replying: it's all about having choices within the marketplace to exchange your property if you wish to do so. Money is just a tool to eliminate the double coincidents of wants. And we trade our property with others to get the things we want in exchange in order to bring us satisfaction or utility. Statists have no respect for this natural behavior on the part of individuals. Statists legislate the seizing of this property (for vote-buying redistribution purposes) and the meddling into this process of exchange. Ending the statists ability to do this is what my priority is. This has nothing to do with lining my own pockets, this has to do with the core of liberty principles. The morality is something I will help shape through persuasion and the strength of the Church -- and if an issue has to be addressed legislatively, best to work at it at the most local level of government, first.