[ansel12]

The real change in numbers is before about 1990 and after 1990, for generations the left used the fake number of 10% which I don’t think many of us ever believed but it was all the media would give us.

10% would be very close to the size of the black population, 10% homosexuals would mean that they would be everywhere and that they would be a part of our everyday lives, families and social circles, not a rarity.

It was only in the many more serious studies of the last 20 years that we started getting studies that offered more credible numbers of 1.3% and 2% and 2.7% depending on how they are done. Now the gay movement is trying to round everything up to 5% in yet another effort to make a more media friendly number than 1.5 for instance.

[TomOnTheRun]

*nod* *nod* Except that I thought that the black population was closer to 20% than 10%. Perhaps that is only in Southern states.

I'd still be interested in more recent studies. I don't take many of them before 1990 very seriously either. I certainly don't trust the ones from the 50's or 60's either. (For different reasons of course.) It's only now that enough time with sound studies has passed that we can establish trending. Even if only for a very short span of time. I expect that to get more interesting over the decades if homosexuality is as culturally based as many people think.