To: GodGunsGuts
Where is your empirical evidence for creation or ID? Or whatever you want to call it now adays.
13 posted on
07/31/2009 2:41:32 PM PDT by
aft_lizard
(Barack Obama is Hugo Chavez's poodle.)
To: aft_lizard
The Bible, composed of the literature of mortal humans, says so. That’s proof enough, LOL!
14 posted on
07/31/2009 2:56:30 PM PDT by
MyTwoCopperCoins
(I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
To: aft_lizard
The Bible, composed of the literature of mortal humans, says so. That’s proof enough, LOL!
16 posted on
07/31/2009 2:56:44 PM PDT by
MyTwoCopperCoins
(I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
To: aft_lizard
The neo-Darwinian so-called “tree of life” was used as “evidence” for common descent. That tree of life is no more, and what we have instead is what looks like an explosion of organisms in the cambrian, all separate and distinct, with not a single uncontrovertible transitional between any of them. Since Creation, ID, and evolution all deal with the unobservable, unrepeatable past, it comes down to which one is the best inference from the extant empirical data. Creation/ID blows away Darwin's fanciful creation myth in this regard, as even the Evos admit biology appears to be designed for a purpose, but then turn around and tell us that this appearance is just an illusion perpetrated by random possesses plus survival.
To: aft_lizard
"Where is your empirical evidence for creation or ID? Or whatever you want to call it now adays." The wisdom of God.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson