Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmost

In many cases, they were in fine locations, which then were overtaken by progress. In other cases, they were in fine locations but were moved to less intrusive nearby places, which almost always are near heat sources.


12 posted on 08/06/2009 11:09:36 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
This seems a bit more than coincidence.

"We found 68 stations located at wastewater treatment plants"
15 posted on 08/06/2009 11:14:59 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Exactly.

And what they are really measuring is urban expansion, not climate change.

The common counter-argument by the alarmists is that the United States is only 3% of the land area on Earth. The counter-counter-point is that the United States is supposed to have the best temperature measurement record and is thus used as a correction factor for the rest of the world’s lousy record of measurements. But if the correction factor is wrong, then so is the global trend.


21 posted on 08/06/2009 11:26:08 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson